Is there a limit to how small we can go?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bozo the clown
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Finite Point
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of a minimum size limit in physics, questioning whether there is a smallest possible distance, or "quanta of length." If such a limit exists, it raises implications about instantaneous movement and the possibility of faster-than-light travel, which contradicts current physics. The Planck length is mentioned as a potential candidate for this limit, but it is noted that its status as a definitive quanta of length remains uncertain. Additionally, exploring these minuscule domains could require immense energy and might even lead to the formation of black holes. Ultimately, the consensus is that the existence of a smallest unit of length is still an open question in the realm of quantum gravity.
bozo the clown
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
Is there a point at which you cannot go any smaller ?
if there is, than to move from X to Y (the distance between X and Y being 1 unit of that finite smallness) would be instantaneous right as if it wasnt you would have to move acroos that point indicating smaller units so therefore if there is a point of finite smallness than faster than speed of light would be passed if faster than light is not possible than there must be infinite smallness
understand ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This pretty much explains it all:
http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae281.cfm
You can't do anything instantaneously because that has no physical meaning. As that page says, even a photon traveling at the speed of light would take some time (planck time) to cover this smallest space (planck length).
 
bozo the clown said:
Is there a point at which you cannot go any smaller ?
if there is, than to move from X to Y (the distance between X and Y being 1 unit of that finite smallness) would be instantaneous right as if it wasnt you would have to move acroos that point indicating smaller units so therefore if there is a point of finite smallness than faster than speed of light would be passed if faster than light is not possible than there must be infinite smallness
understand ?

If there is a smallest possible distance, then wouldn't there be a smallest possible duration as well? These could balance out so that faster than light travel wouldn't happen.

Keep in mind that the energy levels required to explore these domains gets drastically big, and then you've got relativistic effects to account for. I'm not an expert, but it's possible that looking too closely at these domains would create a black hole that you miht fall into, so be careful!
 
Chen said:
This pretty much explains it all:
http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae281.cfm
You can't do anything instantaneously because that has no physical meaning. As that page says, even a photon traveling at the speed of light would take some time (planck time) to cover this smallest space (planck length).

The answer in the link isn't authoritve, it's inaccurate to call the Planck length the quanta of length as we simply don't know. It's the length at which quantum gravity is expected to manifest itself.

So the answer to the original question is that nobody knows if there is a 'quanta of length'. All experiments so far have shown no evidnece of that there is one, but it may well be the case that it will arise out of a theory of quantum gravity.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top