Is There a Method for Integrating Sinx/x Between 0 and Infinity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter heidernetk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
AI Thread Summary
Integrating sin(x)/x from 0 to infinity does not yield an elementary primitive function, but the result is known to be π/2, which can be approximated numerically as 1.571 using software like Matlab. The integral can be solved using complex analysis or Fourier analysis, specifically through contour integration and residue theory. A common method involves evaluating the integral over a semicircular contour in the upper half-plane while addressing the singularity at the origin. The residue theorem is applied to relate the contour integral to the sum of residues, ultimately leading to the desired result. Integration by parts is not applicable for this integral, as its antiderivative is defined as the non-elementary Si(x) function.
heidernetk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Can you help me by giving me a method or solution



integrating sinx/x between (0,infinty)

please help me
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
sinx/x does not have the elementary primitive function. You can calculate it numerically by a program. I used Matlab and calculated it as :1.571
 
pixel01 said:
sinx/x does not have the elementary primitive function. You can calculate it numerically by a program. I used Matlab and calculated it as :1.571
That's an approximation to \pi / 2. Actually, the result
\int_0^\infty \frac{\sin x}{x} \: dx = \frac{\pi}{2}
is somewhat well-known. It can be proved using complex analysis or Fourier analysis. heidernetk, do you have experience with either?

(I also seem to recall seeing another way of doing this that doesn't use complex/Fourier analysis, but I can't remember how the argument went.)
 
Using contour integration you can solve this. The trick is to use

\int\frac{e^{iz}}{z} \: dz and find the imaginary part. This can be done using residue theory. However, I took that course long ago and don't know all the steps.
 
Last edited:
If i recall you can take the integral over a quarter circle with a radius of R in the complex plane and Quadrant I. Then look at the over all path compared to the path partitioned into linear components an the circular component as R tends to infinity.
 
pixel01 said:
sinx/x does not have the elementary primitive function. You can calculate it numerically by a program. I used Matlab and calculated it as :1.571
There wouldn't be much point in asking the question for a maths homework/question sheet if the answer was "Done by computer". For integrals such as sinx/x, particularly when the limits involve infinity, complex analysis is often the way to go.
robert Ihnot said:
However, I took that course long ago and don't know all the steps.
For the benefit of the original poster mostly :

1. Make the contour the semicircle through the upper half plane but with a slight bump around the origin due to singularity (due to cos part of e^iz)
2. Split the contour into 4 parts, from epsilon to R along the Real axis, the semicircle arc of radius R round to -R on the Real axis, from -R to -epsilon and then a semicircle from -epsilon to +epsilon. Doesn't matter which side of the origin that little contour goes, the orientated nature of the path sorts out the signs and residue contributions.
3. Use the residue theorem to relate this contour integral to the sum of residues within the contour.
4. Take R->infinity and use Jordan's Lemma to justify it giving zero contribution. By the fact the imaginary part of e^iz/z is even, you end up having the integrals from -infinity to -epsilon being equal to +epsilon to +infinity.
5. Thus means you just have to compute the little contour and the residue at zero. Stick it in the equation due to the Residue Theorem, rearrange and all going well and a following wind, you should get the answer.

On the scale of things, one of the much nicer contour integrals one ever does. I used to freakin' hate ones involving branch cuts from say -1 to +1.
 
Is there any way to solve this using integration by parts.
 
No there isn't and this is really pointless but the anti derivative is defined to be the non elementary Si(x) function.
 
Back
Top