¿Is there a minimal standard model for ZFC?

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of a minimal standard mathematical model for Zermelo set theory and whether other models contain this model. The link provided offers an article discussing this topic further. The conversation also questions whether there are examples of sets that are not in the minimal model of ZFC and whether all sets are definable in this model. The final question asks if there are any sets that are definable in the minimal model of ZC but not in that model.
  • #1
Garrulo
61
0
¿Is there a minimal standard methamatematical model for Zermelo set theory in the sense that the other models contains this model ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #3
Are there examples of set that it isn´t in the minimal model of ZFC
 
  • #4
Sorry for my bad english, but are there any example of a set which it isn´t in the minimal model of ZFC, or are there all the definable in this model?
 
Last edited:
  • #5
I reformulate the question: are there any set that it is definable in the minimal model of ZC but it isn´t in that model ??
 
Last edited:

1. What is ZFC?

ZFC stands for Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with the axiom of choice. It is a foundational theory in mathematics that provides a rigorous and formal framework for the study of sets and their properties.

2. What is the minimal standard model for ZFC?

The minimal standard model for ZFC is the smallest model that satisfies all of the axioms of ZFC. It is often denoted as V(ω), where ω represents the first infinite ordinal number. This model is unique up to isomorphism and provides a foundation for most of modern mathematics.

3. Is the minimal standard model for ZFC well-defined?

Yes, the minimal standard model for ZFC is a well-defined mathematical structure. It is constructed using the von Neumann hierarchy and follows the axioms of ZFC, ensuring that it is consistent and free from contradictions.

4. What is the significance of the minimal standard model for ZFC?

The minimal standard model for ZFC serves as a foundation for modern mathematics. It allows mathematicians to reason about sets and their properties in a rigorous and consistent manner. It also provides a basis for constructing larger models of ZFC and studying the properties of these models.

5. Are there any limitations to the minimal standard model for ZFC?

While the minimal standard model for ZFC is a powerful tool for studying sets and their properties, it does have limitations. For example, it does not provide a complete answer to the continuum hypothesis, which states that there is no set whose cardinality is strictly between the cardinality of the integers and the cardinality of the real numbers. This and other open questions in set theory continue to be areas of active research.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
729
Replies
5
Views
860
Replies
6
Views
724
  • General Math
Replies
2
Views
164
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
5
Views
949
  • General Math
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top