Is There a Mistake in the Spin Quantum Paradox Calculation?

jk22
Messages
732
Reaction score
25
Suppose we consider the spin 1/2 measurement matrices

B=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 1\\1&-1\end{array}\right) and A=diag(1,-1)

it's easy to show that B^2=A
and a normalized eigenstate of B |\Psi\rangle=\left(\begin{array}{c}a\\b\end{array}\right) with eigenvalue 1 : B|\Psi\rangle=|\Psi\rangle

then we obvisouly have \langle B^2\rangle=\langle\Psi|BB|\Psi\rangle=1

But \langle A\rangle=a^2-b^2<1 since the eigenvector of A are not along x.

This implies that 1<1 ?? which is wrong, but I can't understand where the mistake hides.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jk22 said:
it's easy to show that B^2=A

I didn't read the whole post thoroughly, so there might be other mistakes, but is it? It would seem to me that B2=1 :-p.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top