Is There a Non-Calculus Method to Prove this Thermodynamic Inequality?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the inequality \( \frac{y^x-1}{xy^{x-1}(y-1)}<1 \) for \( x, y \in \mathbb{R} \) with \( x>1 \) and \( y>1 \) without using calculus. Participants suggest manipulating the expression by subtracting 1 and finding a common denominator to analyze the signs of the numerator and denominator. The challenge lies in demonstrating that the numerator \( y^x - 1 - xy^x + xy^{x-1} < 0 \) is negative. Suggestions include experimenting with specific values of \( x \) and \( y \) and graphing the left-hand side and right-hand side to visualize their relationship. Overall, the conversation emphasizes exploring alternative mathematical approaches to validate the inequality.
emroz92
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
Prove that
$$ \frac{y^x-1}{xy^{x-1}(y-1)}<1$$
where x,y \in ℝ, x&gt;1 and y&gt;1.

I was able to prove it using calculus, but am wondering if there was another way of doing so, like exploiting some inequality-theorems which involves real numbers. I'll be glad if anyone can show me a way and quench my hunch.

Cheers.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
$$ \frac{y^x-1}{xy^{x-1}(y-1)}<1$$
where x,y \in ℝ, x&gt;1 and y&gt;1.

hmmm, not a fancy theorem but ... did you try - subtract 1 from both sides and put the LHS over a common denominator:

which means that either the numerator or the denominator is negative.

notice that the denominator is a product of only positive numbers?
see where this is going?
 
Thanks. But I am afraid I still can't see how the numerator is negative; that is:
$$y^x-1-xy^x+xy^{x-1}<0$$.
I was stuck with this expression before you pointed out. I think this part is the difficult one.
 
It is sometimes easier to see when something is negative ... you may have to experiment a bit to find a pattern... i.e. if x=1, what values of y will make the relation = 0, what values >0 and what values <0?

Alternatively:
$$\Rightarrow y^x-1 < xy^{x-1}(y-1)$$
... what conditions have to be satisfied for that to be true?
You should be able to see how it will be true just by graphing the LHS and the RHS.
Try figuring what y and x could be - like what happens is x>1 and 0<y<1 ?

geometrically, the LHS and RHS describe surfaces in 3D - LHS=RHS will be the intersection of these two surfaces.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top