Is there a Path for Galaxies Moving Away?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ranjanbloom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galaxy Path Speed
AI Thread Summary
Galaxies are observed to be moving away from each other, with their speed proportional to their distance, suggesting a universal expansion. The discussion raises the possibility that galaxies may follow specific paths influenced by gravitational forces, challenging the concept of a uniformly expanding universe. Current measurements, such as redshift, allow astronomers to accurately determine the recession velocities of galaxies. The conversation also touches on the varying speeds of celestial objects, influenced by their proximity to gravitational sources. Ultimately, the nature of galaxy movement and the expansion of space remains a complex topic in astrophysics.
ranjanbloom
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
We all know that Galaxies are moving away from each other at a great speed, Is there any specific path through which they are moving?

Again we know few things about the Universe like Moons rotate around Planets, Planets around star, stars around the center of galaxy. And it seems all follow a system & that is the Gravitational force.

Earlier astronomers felt like Earth is constant & Sun is moving around it, but gradually they came to know the actual fact. Till now we know about the Stars as they rotate around the center of galaxy i.e. the black hole, So it may happen black holes are also rotating around some massive force along with the Galaxy. If that is true then all Galaxies are having a path & it will reject the concept that Universe is Expanding.

Here One more thing is that the distance between two planets in our Solar system never be same always, sometimes we may see the distance is getting more & sometimes less. This all because of the paths & we know this, as these planets are much close to us as compared to distant galaxies.

I feel we can find out this once we have some more powerful Telescope that we have now.

Whatever the astronomers found till date about the Universe is nothing but an Organized System, every object is well placed with a specific path, whereas the fact that Galaxies are moving away from each other is not matching the whole concept that already proved by astronomers.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
ranjanbloom said:
We all know that Galaxies are moving away from each other at a great speed, Is there any specific path through which they are moving?
Except for ones near enough to each other to be gravitationally bound, they are all moving directly away from each other at a speed roughly proportional to their distance from each other (ie, the further apart, the higher the speed).
Till now we know about the Stars as they rotate around the center of galaxy i.e. the black hole, So it may happen black holes are also rotating around some massive force along with the Galaxy. If that is true then all Galaxies are having a path & it will reject the concept that Universe is Expanding.
Motion of galaxies can be easily measured via red-shift, so astronomers are pretty sure they know the recession velocity of the galaxies reasonably accurately.
Here One more thing is that the distance between two planets in our Solar system never be same always, sometimes we may see the distance is getting more & sometimes less. This all because of the paths & we know this, as these planets are much close to us as compared to distant galaxies.
Again, we can certainly tell whether galaxies are getting closer to us or moving away.
I feel we can find out this once we have some more powerful Telescope that we have now.
Astronomers will always want more powerful telescopes, but as far as confirming the Big Bang theory goes, the margin for error is already exceedingly small. The Hubble can already see and measure the speed of objects more than 13.2 billion light years away - just a few hundred million years after the Big Bang and not long after galaxies started to form.
Whatever the astronomers found till date about the Universe is nothing but an Organized System, every object is well placed with a specific path, whereas the fact that Galaxies are moving away from each other is not matching the whole concept that already proved by astronomers.
I'm not quite following: there are no big flaws in the BBT. The fact that galaxies are moving away from each other matches with the predictions of the BBT.
 
Thanks for your great explanation, I have one more question "What is the major factor behind the speed of any object in space?". The speed of a star, planet, moon all varies. E.g. If a planet is close to the star then it will be be having greater speed than the planet that is far away. Similarly Speed of the Galaxies are also vary to each other, What is the factor behind this?
 
ranjanbloom said:
Thanks for your great explanation, I have one more question "What is the major factor behind the speed of any object in space?". The speed of a star, planet, moon all varies. E.g. If a planet is close to the star then it will be be having greater speed than the planet that is far away.
Objects that are close enough to each other to be gravitationally bound are interacting due to gravity. That would be the planets, stars, etc. up through our local group of galaxies. All of this motion one way or another started as gravitational potential energy as the slight granularity of our early ball-of-plasma universe led to coalescing into these forms.
Similarly Speed of the Galaxies are also vary to each other, What is the factor behind this?
Beyond our local group of galaxies, the word "motion" as we normally think about it is not really applicable any more. Objects appear to be moving apart, but the reality is that the space between them is expanding. Though the word is often still used, it isn't the same kind of motion.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top