Is There a Quadratic Equation for Polynomials in Z_n?

lol_nl
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Working through A Book of Abstract Algebra, I encountered several exercises on roots of polynomials in Z_{n} I was just wondering whether there exists something like a quadratic equation for polynomials of degree 2. If the solutions of the usual quadratic formula happen to be integers, can one simply take these modulo n to find solutions of the quadratic in Z_{n}? What if they are not integers? Clearly a field extension is needed to find solutions, but how does this precisely work?

As an example, consider the equation x^{2} + x + 1 = 0 in Z_{2}. The quadratic equation gives x = -\frac{1}{2} \pm \frac{1}{2} i. Suppose you name the positive root as c. Then Z_{2}(c) = {0,1,c,1+c} is the field extension. Now can one work with c in the same way as with x = -\frac{1}{2} \pm \frac{1}{2} i? Clearly, you easily get contradictions like 1 = -1 = 2c-1 = 3i = i and so on.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe it's a good first step to identify a good field extensions that allows you to have roots.

If we have the polynomial X^2+X+1 in \mathbb{Z}_2, then we can look at the polynomial ring \mathbb{Z}_2[c].
Now, we let F=\mathbb{Z}_2[c]/(c^2+c+1) the quotient of the polynomial ring with the ideal (X^2+X+1). This is again a field, as is easily checked.

The elements of F are \{0,1,c,c+1\} as you suspected.
Now, an important feature of this field is that c^2=-c-1. This allows you to multiply all numbers in the field.

Now, you can not work with c as you can work with -\frac{1}{2}\pm \frac{1}{2}i. One reason for that is already that \frac{1}{2} doesn't make any sense in \mathbb{Z}_2

If you want to work with an analogous things as i then you will have to look for solutions to the equation X^2+1=0. Clearly, X=1 is the only solution to this equation. So in this case, there is no need to make an element i such that i^2=-1. We already have such an element. That is: i=1. So if you work in F or in \mathbb{Z}_2, then you can safely say i=1. Even better: you don't need to talk about i.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top