Is there a quantitative measure for the nonlinearity of PDEs?

hitmre
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I understand some PDE is linear like
\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}+\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}=0
while some PDE is nonlinear like
\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}+f\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}=0

Some PDE is weak nonlinear and some is strong nonlinear.

I am wondering whether there is any quantitative measure of the nonlinearity? Many thank!



Joseph
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's write our differential equation in the form

$$ \hat{D}[f] + \hat{L}f =0,$$

where ##\hat{L}## is a linear operator and ##\hat{D}## contains all of the nonlinear terms. We can assume that ##f ## belongs to a Banach space ##X## and ##\hat{D}:X\rightarrow Y##, with ##Y## another a Banach space. Then it seems that a common definition of weak nonlinearity is that ##\hat{D}## is Lipschitz continuous. This means that, given ##f_1,f_2\in X## and a metric ##d_X(,)## on ##X##, that

$$ d_Y ( \hat{D}[f_1], \hat{D}[f_1] )\leq K d_X (f_1,f_2) $$

for some constant ##K\geq 0##. The wiki describes how this works for functions, rather than operators, but the ideas are the same.

This suggests that for ##f_1\neq f_2##, the quantity

$$ C[f_1,f_2] = \frac{ d_Y ( \hat{D}[f_1], \hat{D}[f_1] )}{d_X (f_1,f_2)} $$

would be studied as a measure of nonlinearity. There could be domains of ##X## where this is bounded and constant, while in other domains it is not. Unfortunately I am not familiar with the literature on these concepts, but perhaps the extra terminology would help your search.
 
Thank you fzero!

It seems a good idea. I am wondering whether this definition
$$ C[f_1,f_2] = \frac{ d_Y ( \hat{D}[f_1], \hat{D}[f_2] )}{d_X (f_1,f_2)} $$
is widely use.

Many thanks!
joseph

fzero said:
Let's write our differential equation in the form

$$ \hat{D}[f] + \hat{L}f =0,$$

where ##\hat{L}## is a linear operator and ##\hat{D}## contains all of the nonlinear terms. We can assume that ##f ## belongs to a Banach space ##X## and ##\hat{D}:X\rightarrow Y##, with ##Y## another a Banach space. Then it seems that a common definition of weak nonlinearity is that ##\hat{D}## is Lipschitz continuous. This means that, given ##f_1,f_2\in X## and a metric ##d_X(,)## on ##X##, that

$$ d_Y ( \hat{D}[f_1], \hat{D}[f_1] )\leq K d_X (f_1,f_2) $$

for some constant ##K\geq 0##. The wiki describes how this works for functions, rather than operators, but the ideas are the same.

This suggests that for ##f_1\neq f_2##, the quantity

$$ C[f_1,f_2] = \frac{ d_Y ( \hat{D}[f_1], \hat{D}[f_1] )}{d_X (f_1,f_2)} $$

would be studied as a measure of nonlinearity. There could be domains of ##X## where this is bounded and constant, while in other domains it is not. Unfortunately I am not familiar with the literature on these concepts, but perhaps the extra terminology would help your search.
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top