Is There a Simpler Method for Integrating xe^0.1x?

  • Thread starter Thread starter morson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrate
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of the function xe^(0.1x), specifically the integral ∫xe^(0.1x) dx. Participants are exploring various methods of integration and questioning the complexity of the approaches available.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of u-substitution and integration by parts as potential methods. There is a suggestion to differentiate parts of the integral to express it in terms of derivatives. Questions arise about the simplicity of these methods and whether there are alternative techniques.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing their thoughts on different integration techniques. Some guidance has been offered regarding integration by parts, while others are exploring the implications of differentiating parts of the integral. There is no explicit consensus on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about their familiarity with integration techniques, indicating varying levels of experience with the subject matter.

morson
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[tex]\int {x}{e^{0.1x}} dx[/tex]

Homework Equations



U-substitution, differentiating.

The Attempt at a Solution



We have [tex]\int {x}{e^{0.1x}} dx[/tex]

Let [tex]u = 0.1x[/tex] therefore [tex]du = 0.1 dx[/tex] ==> [tex]dx = 10du[/tex]

Substituting back into the equation and using the fact that [tex]x = 10u[/tex]:

[tex]\int {10u}{e^{u}} 10 du[/tex] = [tex]100 \int {u}{e^u} du[/tex]

At this point I'm stuck. Is there another, simpler method?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Use integration by parts.

Let
u=x
dv=e^(0.1x) dx
 
This looks OK.

To proceed further, what is another (besides substitution) technique of integration?
 
George Jones said:
This looks OK.

To proceed further, what is another (besides substitution) technique of integration?

I haven't been studying integration for very long, but I learned a method where you differentiate one part of the integral and express the integral in terms of the derivative, and then use the fact that [tex]\int f'(x) = f(x) + C[/tex]

I'll have a shot:

From [tex]\int {x}{e^{0.1x}} dx[/tex]

[tex]\frac {d}{dx} {x}{e^{0.1x}} = {e^{0.1x}} + {0.1}{x}{e^{0.1x}} = {e^{0.1x}}({1} + {0.1}{x})[/tex]

I don't know how to express the integral in terms of f'(x), though.
 
Last edited:
You have found
[tex]\frac {d}{dx} xe^{0.1x} = e^{0.1x}(1 + 0.1x)[/tex]

Multiply that by 10 and integrate both sides:

[tex]10x{e^{0.1x}} = \int 10 e^{0.1x}dx + \int xe^{0.1x} dx[/tex]

You know how to integrate

[tex]\int 10 e^{0.1x}dx[/tex]

This integration technique amounts to making a guess at what type of function the answer will be, and (if you guess right) reducing the problem to a simpler one.

For this problem the standard method of integration by parts (which you might not have learned yet) will produce the answer without the need to guess what form it might take.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K