Is there a simpler way to solve for time in this algebraic equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jKotha
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Stuck
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the algebraic equation 0 = (22)t + 1/2(-9.8)t^2 for time (t) without using the quadratic formula. The user successfully factors the equation to t(22 - 4.9t) = 0, leading to two solutions: t = 0 and t = 4.49 seconds. The value 4.9 is derived from the acceleration due to gravity, represented as 1/2 * 9.8 m/s². The forum participants confirm that the relevant solution for the context of the problem is t = 4.49 seconds, indicating when the object returns to its original position.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic algebraic manipulation
  • Familiarity with factoring quadratic equations
  • Knowledge of kinematic equations in physics
  • Concept of acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/s²)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study factoring techniques for quadratic equations
  • Learn about kinematic equations and their applications in physics
  • Explore the derivation of gravitational acceleration and its significance
  • Practice solving real-world problems involving projectile motion
USEFUL FOR

Students in algebra and physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone seeking to improve their problem-solving skills in mathematics and physics.

jKotha
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
hey hey.. I need help again. I can't believe I've forgotten my simple algebra. Anyway.. is there a way to solve the following without using the quadratic equation?

0 = (22)t + 1/2(-9.8)t^2

I'm tryin to isolate t, so i can solve for time. I know you can factor it out as follows..

0 = [22 + 1/2(-9.8)t]t

Thats where I am stuck... how do i get this in the form.. t = xxxxx

Thanks for the help..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
22t -4.9t^{2} = 0 \rightarrow t(22-4.9t) = 0

t = 0 or 22-4.9t = 0, t = 4.49
 
where did the 4.9 come from? nevermind.. figured that out.. THANKS!>. i feel really dumb now because i should have known that.. sometimes i complicate myself too much.
 
Last edited:
Thats usually the best method but for this one it is not necessary.
Picking up from u
0 = [22 + 1/2(-9.8)t]t
Therefore
t = 0 and 22 + 1/2 (-9.8)t =0
finally:
t= 0, 4.49s

I think it is the second answer that you probably want. Since this type of question is probably asking when the onject will return to its original position.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
2K