Is there a standard equation for a 4 by 4 inverse?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a standard equation for the inverse of a 4 by 4 matrix. The original poster expresses difficulty in locating such an equation in their resources and seeks guidance on whether a general method exists.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the possibility of deriving an explicit formula for the inverse of a 4 by 4 matrix, suggesting it may be an extension of known methods for lower-dimensional matrices. There is also a request for resources related to 2 by 2 and 3 by 3 cases.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with some participants suggesting that the original poster create their own formula while acknowledging the complexity involved. Links to external resources have been provided, indicating a direction for further exploration.

Contextual Notes

There is an indication that the original poster may need to derive the formula themselves due to the lengthy nature of such expressions for larger matrices. The discussion also hints at the inefficiency of certain methods for matrix inversion.

HF08
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Inquiry:

Is there a standard equation for a 4 by 4 inverse? I know that one exists for 3 by 3, 2 by 2, but I cannot find one in my text nor in my searches online. I know I could find one by using the Jordan-Gaussian Method. But, I would be more comfortable with knowing a 4 by 4 general method/equation. I plan on doing a lot of inverses for a 4 by 4.

If you know of any resources, please help me. Also, if I should find this on my own by scratch, please help me.

Thank You,
HF08
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you should probably create an explicit formula on your own. You don't find it listed just because it's lengthy to write down. But it should be an obvious extension of the lower dimensional cases. It's a matrix of the determinants of the minors of the nxn matrix divided by the determinant of the whole matrix.
 
Thanks

Dick said:
Yes, you should probably create an explicit formula on your own. You don't find it listed just because it's lengthy to write down. But it should be an obvious extension of the lower dimensional cases. It's a matrix of the determinants of the minors of the nxn matrix divided by the determinant of the whole matrix.


Can you please provide some links to the n = 2 and n = 3 cases please? After that, I'll do the rest on my own. Thanks.

HFO8
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
5K