MHB Is there an algorithm for finding x and y in a GCD problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Poirot1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gcd
Poirot1
Messages
243
Reaction score
0
Since 2 is gcd of 2008 and 8002, I can write 2=2008x+8002y for integers x and y. Is there an algorithm for finding x and y?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
meaningless computer jargon I'm afraid. Can you apply the method to the example given please?
 
Poirot said:
meaningless computer jargon I'm afraid. Can you apply the method to the example given please?

\( 8002 = 3 \times 2008 + 1978 \)

\( 2008 = 1 \times 1978 + 30 \)

\(1978 = 65 \times 30 + 28\)

\(30 = 1 \times 28 + 2\)

so:

\[ \begin{array}{ ccccc } 2 &=& 30& -& 28 \\ &=& 30 &-& (1978-65 \times 30 ) \\ &=& 66 \times 30 & - & 1978 \\ &=& 66 \times(2008-1978)&-&1978 \\ &=& 66 \times 2008& -& 67 \times 1978 \\ &=& 66 \times 2008&-& 67 \times (8002-3 \times 2008) \\ &=&(-67)\times 8002&+&267\times 2008 \end{array}\]

CB
 
You should modify wikipedia article.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top