Is there an easier way to do it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter davedave
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation x(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)=840 can be approached by finding factors of 840 or graphing both sides to identify the intersection at x=7. While trial and error is one method, it can be cumbersome. A more efficient approach involves rewriting the equation as a biquadratic by substituting y = x-1.5, leading to a polynomial that simplifies the problem and reveals integer roots, specifically x=7 or x=-4. Overall, while there are multiple methods to solve the equation, leveraging its symmetry can provide a clearer path to the solution.
davedave
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Consider the equation x(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)=840

One way to do it is to find factors of 840. By trial and error, 7 which is a factor of 840 satisfies the equation.

Another way is to graph both sides of the equation and find the intersection which is 7.

Is there an easier way to find the answer without using the graphing calculator and the trial and error method?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
One way to do it is to find factors of 840.

Only if the equation was helpfully constructed to have integer roots - otherwise factors won't help.

Generally speaking, fourth degree equations are hard to solve. In this particular case, the left hand side has a nice symmetry that allows you to rewrite it as a biquadratic equation: substitute y = x-1.5, express the left hand side as a polynomial, and you get a nice biquadratic equation with roots y = +/- 5.5 and therefore x=7 or x=-4.
 
Notice that 292 = 841

If we set B = (x-3)(x-2)(x-1)x

(x-2)(x-1) = x2 - 3x + 2

(x-3)x = x2 - 3x

(x-2)(x-1) - (x-3)x = 2

A = (x-2)(x-1) - 1 = x2 - 3x + 1

A + 1 = (x-2)(x-1)

(x-3)x = A - 1

B = A2 - 1

(x-3)(x-2)(x-1)x + 1 = (x2 - 3x + 1)2 = 292

We can now solve for x.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top