Is there an explanation for the unexpected increase in activity of Nuclide A?

  • Thread starter Thread starter songoku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Activity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the unexpected increase in the activity of Nuclide A, which initially appears to contradict the principles of radioactive decay. The decay constant for Nuclide A is calculated, leading to an initial activity of 2.84 Bq, yet the activity later rises to 10,000 Bq. Participants suggest potential errors in the problem, such as incorrect half-lives or an underestimated initial number of nuclei. They introduce the concept of "Transient Equilibrium," where the decay of a parent nuclide leads to an increase in the activity of its daughter nuclide. The thread emphasizes the need for clarity in the problem's parameters to resolve the apparent contradiction.
songoku
Messages
2,488
Reaction score
393
Homework Statement
Nuclide A decays to nuclide B. Initially, there are ##1.29 \times10^9## nuclei of A and after some time the activity of A is 10 000 Bq. If the half life of A and B is 10 years and 10 hours respectively, find activity of B
Relevant Equations
##A=\lambda N##

##t_{\frac 1 2}=\frac{ln~2}{\lambda}##
I found something I think does not make sense.

Decay constant of A:
$$\lambda_{A}=\frac{ln~2}{t_{\frac 1 2}}$$
$$=\frac{ln~2}{10\times 365 \times 24 \times 3600}$$
$$=2.2\times 10^{-9} / s$$

Initial activity of A = ##\lambda_{A} N_{\text{initial}}## = 2.2 x 10-9 x 1.29 x 109 = 2.84 Bq

Then after some time the activity becomes 10 000 Bq. How can the activity increase instead of decrease?

Is there something wrong with the question or something wrong with me?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
songoku said:
Is there something wrong with the question or something wrong with me?
There's nothing wrong with you! The question appears to have one or more mistakes.

Some possibilities are:
- the half-lives of A and B are the wrong way round;
- ##1.29 \times10^9## is a very small number for a number of nuclei in this context; maybe it should be ##1.29 \times10^{19}## for example.
 
You could at least obtain the general form of the solution.
 
Thank you very much Steve4Physics and haruspex
 
songoku said:
Homework Statement:: Nuclide A decays to nuclide B. Initially, there are ##1.29 \times10^9## nuclei of A and after some time the activity of A is 10 000 Bq. If the half life of A and B is 10 years and 10 hours respectively, find activity of B
Relevant Equations:: ##A=\lambda N##

##t_{\frac 1 2}=\frac{ln~2}{\lambda}##

Then after some time the activity becomes 10 000 Bq. How can the activity increase instead of decrease?
One should research "Transient Equilibrium", where t1/2(parent) > t1/2(daughter), or λ(parent) < λ(daughter). This is observed for the natural decay series of radionuclides 232Th, 235U, 238U and others.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transient_equilibrium
Also see related Secular equilibrium.
 
Astronuc said:
One should research "Transient Equilibrium", where t1/2(parent) > t1/2(daughter), or λ(parent) < λ(daughter). This is observed for the natural decay series of radionuclides 232Th, 235U, 238U and others.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transient_equilibrium
Also see related Secular equilibrium.
At this stage it is not clear from @songoku's posts whether he has any difficulty in solving a correctly posed version of the question. The thread centres on the impossible combination of given facts.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku and Orodruin
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top