Is there any other form of energy releasing fusion besides hydrogen

AI Thread Summary
Other forms of energy-releasing fusion exist beyond hydrogen fusion, primarily involving helium and other light elements, ultimately producing iron as a final product. While these fusion processes are theoretically possible, they are considered impractical for power generation. The discussion highlights that stars transition to these fusion reactions when hydrogen is depleted. The mention of iron relates to its low binding energy per nucleon, which explains its prevalence in stellar processes. Overall, while alternative fusion reactions are recognized, they are not viable for energy production.
dirtyd33
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Is there any other form of energy releasing fusion besides hydrogen fusion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Yes, although for fusion power these are very impractical.
When stars run out of Hydrogen they continue to have fusion reactions, starting with Helium and continuing with light elements, where the final product is mostly Iron.
 


That makes sense. Seems I should have figured that, with iron having the lowest pf and all. Thanks.
dd
:) think inversely :)
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Muonic hydrogen dissociation energy and cross-section
Replies
1
Views
3K
B Energy production that converts Hydrogen to Iron?
3
Replies
105
Views
8K
I Can Neutron-X Fusion Reactions Overcome the Repulsion Problem in Fusion Energy?
Replies
11
Views
2K
Fusion power, still the king of power?
Replies
35
Views
4K
I How Does Hydrogen-Boron Fusion Work?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Catalyzed fusion… hype, or reality?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Fusion of the isotopes of hydrogen
Replies
1
Views
5K
A Why do novas shine?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Binding energy or Kinetic energy?
Replies
3
Views
10K
B Could Fusion Reactions Occur Randomly in the Atmosphere or Planetary Cores?
Replies
19
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top