Is there anything wrong with completing the square this way?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joked
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Square
AI Thread Summary
Completing the square for the expression 3x^2 + 12x + 27 is valid when rewritten as 3((x + 2)^2 + 5). This method, while different from traditional teaching, is affirmed by participants as correct and effective. The key point is that if the expanded form matches the original expression, the method is verified. Concerns arise only if a teacher requires a specific method for instructional purposes. Overall, the approach is accepted as a legitimate alternative for completing the square.
Joked
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
3x^2 + 12x + 27
/3 /3 /3

3(x^2 + 4x + 9),

3(x^2 + 4x + 4 + 9 - 4)

(x^2 + 4x + 4) = (x+2)^2

3((x + 2)^2 +5)


This way is different then how it was taught to me but this way makes more sense to me.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Nope, works just fine. I actually prefer it that way. The idea is that, surely:

3(x^2 + 4x + 4 + 9 - 4) is equal to 3(x^2 + 4x + 9)

If you ever have any doubts, expand it out again. If you get the same thing back, you know you're fine.
 
That is, frankly, the way I have always handled coefficients of x^2.
 
Yup that is correct. I wonder what prompted the question.

I guess the only way that could be incorrect is if a teacher was showing a different method and testing specifically on the knowledge that different method.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top