Is Universe Oscillatory or Cyclical?

  • Thread starter FeedbackPath
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Evidence
In summary, the conversation discusses the possibility of a cyclical or oscillatory universe and the lack of observational evidence for such a theory. The focus then shifts to the need for new instruments to test existing quantum cosmology models and the importance of evidence, whether for or against these theories. The conversation also mentions the concept of phenomenology and provides a list of resources for further reading on the topic.
  • #1
FeedbackPath
5
0
a cyclical or oscillatory universe?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No, there is no observational evidence so far.
We already have some excellent models using quantum effects which would explain a rebound (which might result in a cycle) if future observations uncover signs of one having occurred.

There is no need for amateur theorists, for instance, to offer theoretical ideas to explain hypothetical cycling. Such ideas have already been discussed a whole lot at a professional research journal level---there is more than adequate theoretical preparation.

What is needed now is new instruments sensitive enough to look for features in the ancient light which are predicted by bounce models. It is an area where observation needs to catch up. It would be progress simply to be able to rule out some of the proposed models.

Evidence against would be as welcome and helpful, at this point, as evidence for.

You are asking a question about quantum cosmology (QC) and early universe phenomenology. Phenomenology is the line of research that explores ways of testing theories by observation.
You might find it educational to glance over some of the QC pheno literature. It's a way of contacting the reality of current research in this area and getting some taste of it, or overall impressions. It's not going to be fully understandable, but you can get the flavor and an idea of the main themes. Some article discuss the "observational footprint" of this or that bounce cosmology model. Here are some 46 pheno-oriented papers that have appeared since 2009.

http://www-library.desy.de/cgi-bin/spiface/find/hep/www?rawcmd=FIND+%28DK+LOOP+SPACE+AND+%28QUANTUM+GRAVITY+OR+QUANTUM+COSMOLOGY%29+%29+AND+%28GRAVITATIONAL+RADIATION+OR+PRIMORDIAL+OR+inflation+or+POWER+SPECTRUM+OR+COSMIC+BACKGROUND+RADIATION%29+AND+DATE%3E2008&FORMAT=www&SEQUENCE=citecount%28d%29
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. What is the current scientific understanding of the universe's nature?

The current understanding is that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate and will continue to do so indefinitely, with no evidence of a cyclical or oscillatory pattern. This is supported by various observations, such as the redshift of distant galaxies and the cosmic microwave background radiation.

2. Is there any evidence to support the idea of a cyclical or oscillatory universe?

While there have been theories proposed about a cyclical or oscillatory universe, there is currently no solid evidence to support this idea. Some observations, such as the cosmic microwave background radiation, have been interpreted as potential evidence for a cyclical universe, but these interpretations are still highly debated among scientists.

3. What is the Big Crunch theory and how does it relate to the idea of a cyclical universe?

The Big Crunch theory suggests that the expansion of the universe will eventually reverse and the universe will collapse in on itself, leading to a new Big Bang and the beginning of a new cycle. This theory has been largely disproven by observations of the universe's accelerating expansion, and thus does not support the idea of a cyclical universe.

4. How do scientists study the nature of the universe?

Scientists use a variety of methods, such as observations from telescopes and satellites, computer simulations, and mathematical models, to study the universe. They also conduct experiments to test different theories and hypotheses about the nature of the universe.

5. Could our understanding of the universe change in the future?

Absolutely! As with any field of science, our understanding of the universe is constantly evolving as new evidence is discovered and new theories are proposed. It is possible that future observations or experiments could provide new insights into the nature of the universe and potentially change our current understanding.

Similar threads

A Would Wheeler's oscillatory universe model create different laws?
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
A Is MOND Inadequate for Explaining Vertical Oscillations in Galaxy Motions?
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Are there other renowned physicists who believe in evolving laws of physics?
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Difference between oscillatory/cyclic model and big bounce?
    • Cosmology
Replies
1
Views
2K
Simulation of Cyclic Loading in Tensile Test
    • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
14
Views
395
I Is Penrose's Cyclic Cosmology Model Only Applicable on a Local Scale?
    • Cosmology
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Optical pumping vs Rabi cycle - what is the difference between their conditions?
    • Optics
Replies
5
Views
1K
B Is an infinite universe compatible with cyclic models?
    • Cosmology
Replies
1
Views
1K
POTW Product of Two Finite Cyclic Groups
    • Math POTW for University Students
Replies
1
Views
533
MHB Aa.17 Prove that G is cyclic
    • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
752

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top