Is there such a thing as a photonic boom?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dbmorpher
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photonic
dbmorpher
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Hello I'm dbmorpher,
We all know that if you travel at the speed of sound you achieve a sonic boom from the sound bouncing off the object.
Since light behaves similarly to sound would there be such a thing as a "Photonic Boom"?
If so is the reason physical beings cannot travel the speed of light because a photonic boom would destroy us?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dbmorpher said:
Hello I'm dbmorpher,
We all know that if you travel at the speed of sound you achieve a sonic boom from the sound bouncing off the object.
Since light behaves similarly to sound would there be such a thing as a "Photonic Boom"?
If so is the reason physical beings cannot travel the speed of light because a photonic boom would destroy us?

You can think of Cerenkov radiation as a photonic boom:

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/cherenkov.html

However, in a vacuum this is not possible, and has nothing to do with why nothing goes faster than c. A better way to look at this is that the structure of spacetime divides events into causally connected and causally disconnected. The constant c determines the surface of possible causal connection. It just happens that light, being massless (so far as we know) travels at the maximum speed of causal influence.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
41
Views
5K
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
306
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top