Is 5^x a Valid Term in a Polynomial?

  • Thread starter Thread starter joshonator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Rational
AI Thread Summary
5^x is not a valid term in a polynomial, as polynomials consist only of terms with non-negative integer exponents. The discussion clarifies that a rational function, such as y=(5x^4 + 5^x -1)/(2x^3 +1), is defined as the quotient of two polynomial functions. The initial inquiry about the validity of 5^x in a polynomial is addressed, confirming its invalidity. The conversation also touches on the nature of the responses, emphasizing the importance of clear communication. Overall, the consensus is that 5^x does not qualify as a polynomial term.
joshonator
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
y=(5x^4 + 5^x -1)/(2x^3 +1)

More specifically is 5^x a valid term in a polynomial?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
joshonator said:
More specifically is 5^x a valid term in a polynomial?

It is not.

A rational function is defined as the quotient of two polynomials functions. Like you said, 5x is not a valid term of a polynomial.
 
checkitagain said:
gb7nash,

there is no "like you said," because the OP didn't state that 5^x isn't
a valid term of a poynomial. He asked if it was.

...and gb7nash answered him. Is this really something to nitpick about?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top