Is This Cocaine Concentration Calculation Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Scarpetta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the accuracy of a cocaine concentration calculation based on peak heights from two standards. The initial calculation yielded a slope (m) of 461821.62 and an intercept (c) of 6132, leading to an estimated concentration of 6.6% for an unknown sample. However, a participant pointed out discrepancies in significant figures and suggested recalculating using a slope of 450000, resulting in a concentration of 6%. The feedback highlighted the importance of precision in calculations and the impact of significant figures on results. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for careful verification in analytical chemistry calculations.
Scarpetta
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Can anyone tell me if this concentration calculation is correct please, its my first attempt and a bit unsure.
Two point determination of cocaine sample
Cocaine (mg/ml) Average peak height
0.015 13059
0.20 98496
Unknown (2mg/ml) 61136General equation Y = mx + c
Equation 1 standard 1: 13059 = 0.015m + c
Equation 2 standard 2: 98496 = 0.20m + c
98496 – 13059 = 85437
0.20 – 0.015 = 0.185
therefore 85437 = 0.185m + 0
85437 / 0.185 = m
m = 461821.62
c = 13059 = (0.015 X 461821.62)
13059 – (0.015 X 461821.62) = 6132
So, Y = 461821.62 X + 6132
Unknown therefore:
61136 = 461821.62 X + 0
= 61136 – 0 / 461821.62 = 0.13
0.13 / 2 X 100 = 6.6%
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Scarpetta said:
So, Y = 461821.62 X + 6132
Unknown therefore:
61136 = 461821.62 X + 0
= 61136 – 0 / 461821.62 = 0.13
0.13 / 2 X 100 = 6.6%

Why? You just determed that c is 6132. Following your logic it should be
61136 = 461821.62 X + 6132

0.20 – 0.015 = 0.19 <-- here you have only 2 significant figures.
therefore 85437 = 0.19m
85437 / 0.19 = m = 450000

Hence 61136 = 450000*x + 6132
55004 = 450000*x , x = 0.12
0.12/2 = 0.06 = 6%
 
not bad for a first attempt, close but no cigar, thankx for the pointers
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top