Is This Cubic Equation Solvable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter marlon
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The cubic equation x^3 + 3x^2 + 9x + 3 = 0 does not have any integer solutions. To find the roots, the cubic formula must be applied, as the equation is complex. The approximate solutions are -1.312 + 2.5087i, -1.312 - 2.5087i, and -0.374. The discussion highlights the necessity of using advanced methods for solving cubic equations. Overall, the equation is solvable but requires non-integer solutions.
marlon
Messages
3,779
Reaction score
11
Can anyone solve the following equation ?

x^3 + 3x^2 +9x + 3 = 0

I don't find it


regards
marlon
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Muzza said:
It doesn't appear to have any integer solutions, so you'll probably have to use the ugly cubic formula to get a (non-approximated) answer.

http://www.math.vanderbilt.edu/~schectex/courses/cubic/


OK? THANKS A LOT

marlon
 
-1.312+2.5087i
-1.312-2.5087i
-0.374

=)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Back
Top