B Does Dark Energy Explain the Expansion of Space in Relativity?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Sachabloke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dark energy Energy
Sachabloke
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Is dark energy a manifestation of relativity?
Consider a particle traveling near the speed of light towards a planet- relativity states that the space according to the particle shrinks between the particle and the planet as the particle accelerates toward the planet.
My question is - would the space behind the particle expand relative to an observer watching it accelerate away?
If this is true this would create the impression of expanding space between objects moving away from each other (dark energy).
Dark energy = solved!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sachabloke said:
would the space behind the particle expand relative to an observer watching it accelerate away?
No. Length contraction is just a coordinate effect, and applies to all lengths parallel to the direction of motion, independent of the position of what it is you are measuring.
Sachabloke said:
If this is true this would create the impression of expanding space between objects moving away from each other (dark energy).
This is not what dark energy is. Dark energy is a negative pressure term in the stress-energy tensor, not a coordinate effect.
 
  • Like
Likes Michael Price and Dale
Sachabloke said:
relativity states that the space according to the particle shrinks between the particle and the planet as the particle accelerates toward the planet.
This is a very common misunderstanding, but that is not what Special Relativity says. One way to see this is to consider the situation from the point of view of an observer midway between the particle and the planet, so that both are approaching from opposite directions at the same speed. Clearly the the distance between the particle and the planet is getting smaller - that's what "moving towards one another" means - but there's no reason for space to be shrinking anywhere. It is also worth spending some time with the classic pole-barn paradox (google will find many good discussions) of SR to get a better feel for how length contraction does work.

In any case, the answer to your question
would the space behind the particle expand relative to an observer watching it accelerate away?
is "No."
 
  • Like
Likes Michael Price
Thanks for the quick reply! To clarify- lengths parallel to the moving body would decrease (Lorentz contraction) but space would also decrease in the direction of the moving object relative to an object it is moving toward, can you confirm this?
Many thanks!
 
Sachabloke said:
To clarify- lengths parallel to the moving body would decrease (Lorentz contraction) but space would also decrease in the direction of the moving object relative to an object it is moving toward,
This seems to be rather confused. Length contraction means that any length you measure where the end points are moving with respect to you is shorter than when measured by someone who sees the end points at rest. This does include distances between objects, yes. But it isn't really due to "space contracting". It's more closely related to the fact that distance between two lines depends on the angle you measure at (but you have to think about time as a dimension for this to make sense).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
987
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top