Is this possible to integrate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jason17349
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrate
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster presents an integral involving a square root in the denominator, specifically \(\int_0^x \frac{1}{\sqrt{(A+Bx^2+Cx^3+Dx^4)}} \,dx\), and expresses uncertainty about its solvability and how to approach it.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants discuss the possibility of factoring the denominator and mention methods like partial fractions. Others question the notation used in the integral and the implications of changing variables. There is also a suggestion that the integral may not be expressible in elementary functions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations of the integral being explored. Some participants provide insights into the challenges of integration, particularly regarding the use of elliptic integrals, while others question the setup and notation of the integral.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the integral and the potential need for advanced functions, indicating that assumptions about the integrability may need to be revisited.

jason17349
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Please help me integrate the following:

\int_0^x \frac{1}{\sqrt{(A+Bx^2+Cx^3+Dx^4)}} \,dx

I have no idea where to start or if this is even possible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I could be obnoxious, and say yes, just pull that big constant outside the integral, but I won't (or maybe I just did). But if you mean for those x's to be replaced by v's, then this integral is generally only possible if you can factor the denominator. Then you would proceed by the method of partial fractions, which you can look up in google to find an easy explanation of.
 
maybe it's...

\frac{x}{\sqrt{(A+Bx^2+Cx^3+Dx^4)}}
 
You are wrong on both counts, the dv is supposed to be dx :biggrin:
 
I thought of that, but then you lose v altogether, which I figured you might want, and plus you'll have to change the limits of integration. It doesn't really matter.
 
Of course it's integrable.

I'm 99.9% sure its not expressible in terms of "elementary" functions, though.
 
Oh, was that square root always there? I must have missed it. Then, yes, no, you can't integrate it in general without resorting to elliptic itegrals and other messy functions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K