How to Simplify a Complicated Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter powp
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on simplifying the equation (\frac{ab^2c^{-3}}{2a^3b^{-4}})^{-2}. The correct simplification results in \frac{4a^4c^{6}}{b^{12}}. Key rules highlighted include flipping the fraction for negative exponents and applying the exponent to each part of a product. For those unsure of their calculations, using a calculator is suggested as a reliable alternative. The conversation emphasizes understanding the rules of exponents for accurate simplification.
powp
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
is this right??

Hello

I am simplifying this right?



(\frac{ab^2c^{-3}}{2a^3b^{-4}})^{-2}


\frac{4a^4c^{6}}{b^{12}}


Thanks
P
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes you have.
 
just remember the simple rules: if its a negative exponent flip the fraction, and if you have a product under the exponent each part is raised to the power separately.

ofcourse you can always just plug it into a calculator if you don't trust yourself at all...
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top