Is This Spherical Electromagnet a Challenge to Gauss's Law?

AI Thread Summary
A hollow spherical electromagnet has been proposed that allegedly can contain plasma, raising questions about its validity and implications for Gauss's Law. The original poster seeks to understand if this device could disprove the law, which states that the electric field inside a closed surface is zero. Discussion reveals skepticism about the credibility of the invention, particularly since the patent application was filed in 2004 and likely rejected. However, theoretical considerations suggest that the magnetic flux at the center of the sphere would indeed be zero, confirming Gauss's Law. Overall, the device does not appear to challenge established electromagnetic principles.
taylaron
Gold Member
Messages
391
Reaction score
1
I've stumbled upon a website that claims that he has created a hollow spherical electromagnet that could contain plasma.
http://justodians.org/SphericalMagnet/PatentApp.htm
I don't know the credibility of his claims but I would appreciate an analysis of his "invention". Does this device disprove Gauss's law: that the field inside a closed loop is zero? Or is there a mono-directional field (in relation to the center) that increases in strength as it becomes further away from the exact center of the sphere?

Regards- Tay
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
taylaron said:
I've stumbled upon a website that claims that he has created a hollow spherical electromagnet that could contain plasma.
http://justodians.org/SphericalMagnet/PatentApp.htm
I don't know the credibility of his claims but I would appreciate an analysis of his "invention". Does this device disprove Gauss's law: that the field inside a closed loop is zero? Or is there a mono-directional field (in relation to the center) that increases in strength as it becomes further away from the exact center of the sphere?

Regards- Tay

I didn't spend much time reading it. The key phrases are "this invention is given freely to all people", and the fact that he says he filed the patent application in 2004. That means it was rejected.
 
That could very well be; but just because it was supposedly rejected, doesn't necessarily mean it doesn't work. I admit it could be complete garbage.
But theoretically, could the device work? Is the theory sound enough? Although I suppose that is different from my original question. I think I solved my original question (answer is no) because the flux in the center of the "ball" would be zero and there would be surrounding that point.

-Tay
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top