Programs Is Thorton/Marion a Good Starting Point for Self-Studying Mechanics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tronter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degree
AI Thread Summary
Studying mechanics without prior physics coursework can be approached using Thorton/Marion, which is considered accessible for those with a solid math background. However, there is a concern that relying solely on this text might lead to a superficial understanding of the underlying physics concepts. For a more comprehensive grasp, Kleppner & Kolenkow's "An Introduction to Mechanics" is recommended as it emphasizes a physics-oriented perspective and covers essential content effectively. Many believe starting with K&K could provide a stronger foundation before delving into university-level studies.
tronter
Messages
183
Reaction score
1
I want to study mechanics but have never taken a physics course (in college). I flipped through this Thorton/Marion, and it seems pretty easy to follow. Could I start out here for studying mechanics, as opposed to starting out on the traditional texts ("Halliday/Resncick")?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are currently doing a maths degree but want a bit of dynamics?
If you are fine with the maths then I imagine Marion would be a good place to start, but the problem could well arise that you are fine at piecing together problems using maths but do this without really being aware of the physics or thinking about the physics when you are learning the stuff.
A textbook that is a bit more fluffy but covers a good deal of content is Kleppner & Kolenkow's 'An Introduction to Mechanics', it puts the emphasis on a physics outlook.

In fact i wish i'd bought K&K about 2 years ago and started it before i even came to university, i think it's about the best introduction..
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top