Is Time Reversed in Special Relativity When Moving Opposite to Light?

ghost34
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I've just been introduced to special relativity and time dilation. I understand that if someone in a frame of reference X bounces a beam of light vertically within two parallel mirrors, I, in a frame of reference Y moving at a uniform velocity 'U' from X, will see the light beam moving across a hypotenuse (diagonally), and given the postulate that the speed of light is equal for all observers, it will take me more time to view this same beam of light, and the person in frame of reference X can say that my clocks are slowing down. But let's say that the person in frame of reference X intentionally shoots a beam of light diagonally across the same mirrors, so that the light is traveling diagonally within his own frame of reference. If I am moving at velocity U in the opposite direction of the light, is it not possible (if U isn't very large) that I'll see the beam of light traveling across a shorter distance? If this is true, is it not possible that the person in frame of reference X can rightly say that my time will be faster due to how the light appears in my reference frame?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Excellent question ghost34, and welcome to PF.

You're right, the path length would be smaller in the second case, but that would not mean that the effect of time dilation would be reversed.

In special relativity, length contraction only occurs in the direction of motion. Thus, having a light beam traveling perpendicular to the direction of motion (i.e. up and down) makes sure that there is no length contraction effecting the experiment (i.e. the clock). Therefore the only observed effect is due to time dilation.

If you point the laser partially in the direction of motion then two effects are taking place; time dilation and length contraction---making the overall interpretation different.
 
Ah, I see. Thank you very much, zhermes!
 
No, if you move in the opposite direction of the light, then light moves faster in the opposite direction of you, therefore light must move slower in some other direction, which means light must travel a long distance in the direction of the fast motion, in order to travel a short distance in the direction of the slow motion.

It takes a long time to travel a long distance + a short distance

There may be a simple way to say this too.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
45
Views
5K
Replies
51
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top