Is Time Slowing Down? - Examining the Possibility

  • Thread starter Thread starter Quantum1332
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Quantum1332
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Since Andromeda is accelerating toward us and since gravity is the only force that acts at a distance, as well as dialates time, then is it possible that the closer Andromeda gets to us, the slower time goes? This may be very farfetched, but I by no means am not a physicist, and this is just a thought.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The way gravity affects time is somewhat subtler than that.

The fact that Andromeda gets closer would modify our measurements of time with respect to an external observer[/color] (located outside Andromeda and outside our galaxy). For us, things will not have that much of a difference locally.

Also, even when we are talking about an enormous mass, the distance is also extremely large, so you can expect a very, very tiny effect.
 
That Andromedda is approaching would have far less effect than the fact that other galaxies are receding due to the expansion of the universe.
 
ahrkron said:
The way gravity affects time is somewhat subtler than that.

The fact that Andromeda gets closer would modify our measurements of time with respect to an external observer[/color] (located outside Andromeda and outside our galaxy). For us, things will not have that much of a difference locally.

Also, even when we are talking about an enormous mass, the distance is also extremely large, so you can expect a very, very tiny effect.

Yes, it would be relative to the rest of the universe, of course, but I'm not sure that was the point of the question. If the effect would cause time changes to occur slower in relation to the rest of the universe, that would be a real factor, should a catastrophe occur inside or out, to anything that exists long enough that is. What I mean is that if, hypothetically with a capital H, little green men in the distant galaxy, whose civilization decided they'd rather not have humans to spread our dubious values to their planet, might be rather happy to find that we're progressing at a slower speed relative to them, or very unhappy if the other way around.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top