Is Torque Determined by Centripetal or Tangential Acceleration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Haynes Kwon
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between torque, centripetal acceleration, and tangential acceleration. It explores the equation τ = rF and questions whether 'a' refers to centripetal or tangential acceleration. Clarifications are provided regarding the nature of torque as a vector quantity, emphasizing that torque is zero when the force is centripetal since the vectors are parallel. The conversation also touches on the complexities of mass change and the vector cross product in relation to circular motion. Overall, the distinction between centripetal and tangential acceleration is critical for understanding torque in rotational dynamics.
Haynes Kwon
Gold Member
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Since F=Δp/Δt...

Δp=mΔv+vΔm, Δm=0
Δp=mΔv

Therefore, Δp/Δt=mΔv/Δt=ma.
And if I multiply 'r' to both sides

rF=rma, which is τ=rma

My question is: is 'a' centripetal acceleration or is it tangential acceleration?
If 'a' is centripetal acceleration, which is v^2/r, τ=rmv^2/r=mv^2?

Also I don't really get what tangential acceleration is...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Haynes Kwon said:
Since F=Δp/Δt...

Δp=mΔv+vΔm, Δm=0
Δp=mΔv

Therefore, Δp/Δt=mΔv/Δt=ma.
And if I multiply 'r' to both sides

rF=rma, which is τ=rma

My question is: is 'a' centripetal acceleration or is it tangential acceleration?
Tangential

Haynes Kwon said:
Also I don't really get what tangential acceleration is...
Perpendicular to centripetal (if the path is a circle).
 
  • Like
Likes Haynes Kwon
Thank you very much. But may I ask why?
 
The torque is an axial vector quantity, i.e., it is defined by
$$\vec{\tau}=\vec{r} \times \vec{F}.$$
Here, ##\vec{r}## is the radius vector from a fixed point (with respect to which you want to calculate the torque) and ##\vec{F}## the force acting on the particle. Obviously the torque is perpendicular to the plane spanned by ##\vec{r}## and ##\vec{F}##, and it's 0 whenever ##\vec{F} \propto \vec{r}##.

Defining the angular momentum as
$$\vec{L}=\vec{r} \times \vec{p}=m \vec{r} \times \dot{\vec{r}},$$
you get
$$\dot{\vec{L}}=m \dot{\vec{r}} \times \dot{\vec{r}}+m \vec{r} \times \ddot{\vec{r}}=m \vec{r} \times \ddot{\vec{r}}=\vec{r} \times \vec{F}=\vec{\tau}.$$

Particularly this shows that for central forces, i.e., for ##\vec{F} \propto \vec{r}## the angular momentum is conserved.
 
  • Like
Likes Haynes Kwon
Thank you so much.
So you mean that τ=mv^2 is correct?
 
No. I said ##\vec{\tau}=\vec{r} \times \vec{F}##!
 
vanhees71 said:
No. I said ##\vec{\tau}=\vec{r} \times \vec{F}##!
Perhaps I can help clarify to @Haynes Kwon . When the symbol ## \times ## is used between two vectors, it means vector cross product. If the two vectors are parallel or anti-parallel, the result is zero. The two vectors get the maximum cross product when they are perpendicular. In the case of an object moving in a circle, the centripetal force (## F=\frac{mv^2}{r} ##) supplies zero torque because ## \vec{r} \times \vec{F}=0 ##. The vectors ## \vec{r} ## and ## \vec{F} ## lie along the same line=they are anti-parallel, so their vector coss product is zero. Note: For a vector cross product, ## | \vec{A} \times \vec{B} |=|\vec{A}||\vec{B}|sin(\theta) ## where ## \theta ## is the angle between the two vectors.
 
  • Like
Likes Haynes Kwon and vanhees71
Haynes Kwon said:
Since F=Δp/Δt...

Δp=mΔv+vΔm, Δm=0
Δp=mΔv

Therefore, Δp/Δt=mΔv/Δt=ma.
And if I multiply 'r' to both sides

rF=rma, which is τ=rma

My question is: is 'a' centripetal acceleration or is it tangential acceleration?
If 'a' is centripetal acceleration, which is v^2/r, τ=rmv^2/r=mv^2?

Also I don't really get what tangential acceleration is...
[1st point]
We have:
\vec {Δp} =m( \vec Δv )+ ( \vec v )Δm, Δm=/=0, Δm="change in mass".
We can hypothesise that this "transfer of mass"Δm[x]+"change in internal mass distribution"Δm[r], in general.
So, we may have Δm=0 superficially, but Δm=Δm[x]+Δm[r] , in reality. (x='linear measure', r='radial measure')
To clarify, there may be cases Δm=Δm[x] [ii] Δm=Δm[r] [iii] Δm=0.

[2nd point]
Considering case [iii], (which makes sense for circular motion as the mass always returns to the same point):

We take the 'cross product' between the 'pair of vectors': \tilde P={ \vec r , \vec F } ;
such that: \vec r X \vec F = |r| |F| sin(θ) ( \hat n ) , where \hat n ="unit normal vector" to \tilde P .

So, for case [iii], we really have: \tilde τ = |r| |F| sin(θ) ( \hat n ) = |r| m|a| sin(θ) ( \hat n )
The acceleration resultant is comes from the vector addition of nutational (3d only), centripetal 'r' and tangential 'θ' components. We will consider only the latter 2 components, thus: \vec a = \vec a r + \vec a θ

From Newton's Principia, we have:
\vec a r = \dot v θ = \frac { \vec dv θ } {dt} = ( \frac v 2 , R ) \hat r ; with variable R=|r| , v=| \vec v θ | = ωR
and \vec a_θ = \dot{ \vec v r } = \frac { d \vec v r } {dt}.

We could put \vec v r = 0 for circular motion, or ; for simple harmonic motion r could vary sinusoidally wrt t,
so that: r= r 0 sin ( ω r t ) ,
and: vec v r = \frac { \vec r} {dt} =\frac {d ( r 0 sin ( ω r t ) \hat r )} {dt}
⇒ vec v r = ω r r 0 cos ( ω r t ) \hat r +r 0 sin ( ω r t) \frac { d \hat r } {dt}
... substitute \hat r = \vec r / |r| and work out the derivative wrt t , then find \dot{ \vec v r }

By letting |a|=a , we have: \tilde τ = R m a sin(θ) ( \hat n )
The centripetal component can be considered transversal as it varies 'up and down'.

We get a from the sum of the squares of the transversal and tangential components.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top