Is total flux linkage λ=dΨ*Ienclosed/I or λ=N*Ψ?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The total flux linkage in electromagnetic systems can be calculated using two distinct formulas: λ = dΨ * Ienclosed/I for coaxial cables and λ = N * Ψ for solenoids. The former is applicable under specific conditions for coaxial cables, while the latter is the correct approach for solenoids. The discussion highlights the importance of context and definitions in applying these formulas effectively, particularly regarding the symbols used and the theoretical framework being referenced.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic theory
  • Familiarity with the concepts of flux linkage and magnetic fields
  • Knowledge of coaxial cable properties and solenoid behavior
  • Basic grasp of Maxwell's equations and telegrapher's equation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the telegrapher's equation in relation to coaxial cables
  • Explore the principles of solenoid operation and its magnetic field characteristics
  • Learn about the application of Maxwell's equations in electromagnetic theory
  • Investigate the definitions and implications of flux linkage in different contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, physicists studying electromagnetic fields, and anyone involved in the design or analysis of coaxial cables and solenoids.

ElieMakdissi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I don't understand why we multiply by Ienclosed/I the total flux linkage
In Sadiku, he used the formula dλ=dΨ * Ienclosed/I
to determine the total flux linkage for coaxial cable for ρ<a and for a<ρ<b, but I applied this formula for the solenoid and it didn't work, the way that works for the solenoid is by using λ=N*Ψ.

So why we multiply by Ienclosed/I in the coaxial cable?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Without context and even a definition of your symbols I have no clue what you are talking about. E.g., are you looking at the coax cable from the point of view of the "telegrapher's equation", which is a quasistationary approximation, or the full wave-guide theory a la Maxwell and Hertz? What's ##\Psi##?
 
IMG_20230527_160545.jpg
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
15K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
24
Views
8K