I Is total flux linkage λ=dΨ*Ienclosed/I or λ=N*Ψ?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the formulas for total flux linkage in different geometries, specifically comparing coaxial cables and solenoids. The formula dλ=dΨ * Ienclosed/I is used for coaxial cables, while λ=N*Ψ is applied for solenoids. There is confusion regarding the application of these formulas, particularly the role of Ienclosed/I in the coaxial case. Participants seek clarification on the context of the coaxial cable analysis, questioning whether it relates to telegrapher's equations or full wave-guide theory. The need for clear definitions of symbols, such as Ψ, is emphasized for better understanding.
ElieMakdissi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I don't understand why we multiply by Ienclosed/I the total flux linkage
In Sadiku, he used the formula dλ=dΨ * Ienclosed/I
to determine the total flux linkage for coaxial cable for ρ<a and for a<ρ<b, but I applied this formula for the solenoid and it didn't work, the way that works for the solenoid is by using λ=N*Ψ.

So why we multiply by Ienclosed/I in the coaxial cable?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Without context and even a definition of your symbols I have no clue what you are talking about. E.g., are you looking at the coax cable from the point of view of the "telegrapher's equation", which is a quasistationary approximation, or the full wave-guide theory a la Maxwell and Hertz? What's ##\Psi##?
 
IMG_20230527_160545.jpg
 
Happy holidays folks. So I spent some time over the Thanksgiving holidays and developed a program that renders electric field lines of swiftly moving charges according to the Liénard–Wiechert formula. The program generates static images based on the given trajectory of a charge (or multiple), and the images were compiled into a video that shows the animated field lines for harmonic movement and circular movement of a charge (or two charges). Video: The source code is available here...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
12K