I Is total flux linkage λ=dΨ*Ienclosed/I or λ=N*Ψ?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the formulas for total flux linkage in different geometries, specifically comparing coaxial cables and solenoids. The formula dλ=dΨ * Ienclosed/I is used for coaxial cables, while λ=N*Ψ is applied for solenoids. There is confusion regarding the application of these formulas, particularly the role of Ienclosed/I in the coaxial case. Participants seek clarification on the context of the coaxial cable analysis, questioning whether it relates to telegrapher's equations or full wave-guide theory. The need for clear definitions of symbols, such as Ψ, is emphasized for better understanding.
ElieMakdissi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I don't understand why we multiply by Ienclosed/I the total flux linkage
In Sadiku, he used the formula dλ=dΨ * Ienclosed/I
to determine the total flux linkage for coaxial cable for ρ<a and for a<ρ<b, but I applied this formula for the solenoid and it didn't work, the way that works for the solenoid is by using λ=N*Ψ.

So why we multiply by Ienclosed/I in the coaxial cable?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Without context and even a definition of your symbols I have no clue what you are talking about. E.g., are you looking at the coax cable from the point of view of the "telegrapher's equation", which is a quasistationary approximation, or the full wave-guide theory a la Maxwell and Hertz? What's ##\Psi##?
 
IMG_20230527_160545.jpg
 
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...