Is Triangle PQR Isosceles Based on Angle Equality?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter woof123
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that triangle PQR is isosceles based on angle equality. By establishing that angle PQR equals angle QPR, the conclusion follows from the theorem stating that the sides opposite equal angles in a triangle are equal. The calculations demonstrate that angle PRQ is supplementary to the angles formed, leading to the equality of the sides PQ and PR. This logical deduction is rooted in fundamental geometric theorems regarding triangles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic triangle properties and theorems
  • Knowledge of supplementary angles and their implications
  • Familiarity with angle notation and geometric proofs
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions involving angles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of isosceles triangles and their theorems
  • Learn about supplementary angles and their applications in geometry
  • Explore the converse of the isosceles triangle theorem
  • Practice solving problems involving angle relationships in triangles
USEFUL FOR

Students of geometry, mathematics educators, and anyone interested in understanding triangle properties and proofs related to angle equality.

woof123
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I can't figure this one out...(I may not have drawn it exactly how it was drawn in the book)

View attachment 6270
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    10.5 KB · Views: 124
Mathematics news on Phys.org
woof123 said:
I can't figure this one out...(I may not have drawn it exactly how it was drawn in the book)
angle PRQ = 180 - 2x by supplementary angles.

Thus angle PQR = 180 - (x) - (180 - 2x) = x. What does this tell you?

-Dan
 
OK, I get x, meaning the sides opposite to the x angles are equal.

Thanks so much
 
Okay, let's label the unknown angles:

\begin{tikzpicture}
\draw[blue,thick] (0,0) -- (12,0);
\draw[blue,thick] (12,0) -- (8,4);
\draw[blue,thick] (8,4) -- (0,0);
\draw[blue,thick] (8,4) -- (6,0);
\node[left=5pt of {(0,0)}] {\large P};
\node[above=5pt of {(8,4)}] {\large Q};
\node[below=5pt of {(6,0)}] {\large R};
\node[right=5pt of {(12,0)}] {\large S};
\node[right=15pt of {(0,0)},yshift=5pt] {\large $x$};
\node[right=5pt of {(6,0)},yshift=7pt] {\large $2x$};
\node[left=5pt of {(8,4)},yshift=-13pt] {\large $\alpha$};
\node[below=3pt of {(8,4)}] {\large $\beta$};
\node[left=10pt of {(12,0)},yshift=7pt] {\large $\delta$};
\node[above=0pt of {(6,0)},xshift=-3pt] {\large $\gamma$};
\end{tikzpicture}

Now, we know the following:

$$2x+\gamma=180^{\circ}$$

$$x+\alpha+\gamma=180^{\circ}$$

$$2x+\beta+\delta=180^{\circ}$$

$$x+\alpha+\beta+\delta=180^{\circ}$$

We need to show that:

$$x=\alpha$$

Look at the first two equations above, and we see that:

$$180^{\circ}-\gamma=2x=x+\alpha$$

What does this imply?
 
I would like to express my opinion here ;)

Theorem: The exterior angle formed when a side of a triangle is produced
is equal to the sum of the two interior opposite angles.

Now using this theorem,

$2x=x+\angle PQR$
$2x-x= \angle PQR$
$x= \angle PQR$

Then we may recall the theorem,

Theorem (Converse of the theorem on isosceles triangles):
The sides opposite equal angles of a triangle are equal

Now since we have proved that $ \angle PQR =\angle QPR$ what can be said about the sides PQ and PR ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K