Is U(t)=exp(-iH/th) a Lie Group in Quantum Mechanics?

Ratzinger
Messages
291
Reaction score
0
Is U(t)=exp(-iH/th) a Lie group?

Is it an infinite dimensional Lie group?

To what 'family' of Lie groups does it belong?

thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ratzinger said:
Is U(t)=exp(-iH/th) a Lie group?

Is it an infinite dimensional Lie group?

To what 'family' of Lie groups does it belong?

thank you

U(t)=exp(-iHt/h) is a 1-dimensional (the parameter is t) Lie group of unitary operators in the Hilbert space.

In quantum physics it is more common to call U(t)=exp(-iHt/h) a "unitary representation" of the group of time translations. The latter group is usually considered as a 1-dimensional subgroup of the 10-dimensional Poincare group, which also includes space translations, rotations, and boosts.

Eugene.
 
thanks meopemuk!

But the generator of time translation (the Hamilton) consists of differential operators, so do the generators of space translation and angular momentum. Does not that mean an infinite dimenensional Lie algebra?
 
Ratzinger said:
thanks meopemuk!

But the generator of time translation (the Hamilton) consists of differential operators, so do the generators of space translation and angular momentum. Does not that mean an infinite dimenensional Lie algebra?

The dimension of a Lie group is the number of independent parameters of transformations. For time translations there is only one parameter - time, so this group is 1-dimensional. For general Poincare transformation there are 10 independent parameters, so the Poincare Lie group is 10-dimensional.

When you are talking about the Hamiltonian, angular momentum, etc., you are talking not about the Poincare group itself, but about its representation in a Hilbert space. Group elements are represented by unitary operators in an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space. So, the dimension of the corresponding matrices is, indeed, infinite, but this has nothing to do with the dimension of the Lie group or the Lie algebra.

Eugene.
 
many thanks meopemuk!
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
440
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Back
Top