Is Uniform Circular Motion Considered Equilibrium?

AI Thread Summary
A body in uniform circular motion is not in equilibrium because it experiences a net force, specifically centripetal force, directed towards the center of the circular path. For an object to be in mechanical equilibrium, the net force acting on it must be zero, which is not the case here. The presence of centripetal acceleration indicates that a force is continuously acting on the object to maintain its circular motion. Therefore, despite moving at a constant speed, the object is not in equilibrium due to the ongoing centripetal force. This confirms that uniform circular motion does not meet the criteria for equilibrium.
m.medhat
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


if a body is in a uniform circular motion . is it in equilibrium?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


i think it is not in equilibrium ... please i want the true solution .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi m.medhat! :smile:
m.medhat said:
if a body is in a uniform circular motion . is it in equilibrium?

When you say "a body is in a uniform circular motion", do you mean like a bar rotating about its centre, or do you mean like a planet rotating around a star? :confused:
 
Is the object's rotational motion changing with time? If not it is in equilibrium, for an object to be in "mechanical" equilibrium the net torque acting on the object must be zero.
 
i know that a body in equilibrium , the net force acting on it must be zero .
but for the body in uniform circular motion , there is a force acting on it , it is the centripetal force , and the net force here -as i think- not equal zero but equal to centripetal force .
i still need help please .
 
m.medhat said:
i know that a body in equilibrium , the net force acting on it must be zero .
but for the body in uniform circular motion , there is a force acting on it , it is the centripetal force , and the net force here -as i think- not equal zero but equal to centripetal force .

Yes, that's exactly correct :smile:

a body moving with constant angular velocity round a circle (ie not simply rotating on its own centre of mass) is not in equilibrium …

F = ma for that body shows, on the left, the gravitational force or the tension or whatever is forcing it towards the centre, and on the right, (mass times) the centripetal acceleration.

(The left is physics, the right is just geometry … a body moving round a circle must have centripetal acceleration, because the geometry says so. :wink:)

Because of F = ma, since (for constant angular velocity) the acceleration is centripetal, that means that the net force must be centripetal also. :smile:
 
then this means that the body moving with a uniform circular motion is not in equilibrium , isn't it ?

many thanks for answer .
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top