Is Using PV Cells for Water Heating a Cost-Effective Solution in Southern UK?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of using photovoltaic (PV) cells for water heating in the Southern UK. Participants explore various approaches to solar power, including homemade thermal panels and PV systems, while considering installation costs, efficiency, and practical implementation challenges.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests a simple PV system with a low voltage immersion heater in an existing hot tank, estimating a payback time of less than 10 years.
  • Concerns are raised about the costs associated with high-performance thermal panels and the complexity of plumbing systems.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of researching costs per square meter of PV cells, their efficiency, and installation costs.
  • There is a discussion about the relevance of efficiency, with one participant stating that they are primarily concerned with achieving a specific power output rather than the area of the cells.
  • Some participants express interest in personal experiences or additional insights regarding the proposed PV system.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; there are differing views on the importance of efficiency and the practicality of installation. Some participants are focused on the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of the proposed PV solution, while others emphasize the need for thorough research and consideration of various factors.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention potential complexities in installation, such as the need for a suitable flange for the heating element, and the variability in power output based on solar angle, which may affect overall system performance.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in solar energy solutions, particularly those considering DIY approaches to water heating using PV cells, may find this discussion relevant.

sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
30,403
Reaction score
7,470
I keep thinking of doing something with Solar Power. (Southern UK)
The easiest, conceptually would be very basic homemade thermal panels but then there's the problem of how to use the hot (warm) water. That involves plumbing and a special hot tank.
Once you've gone for that, you may as well spend more and get the high performance 'tubes' and it gets really expensive - even when you shop around.

If you go for the PV solution, then people think in terms of going the whole hog, getting connected to the Grid and selling what you don't use. This seems to be flavour of the month and there are many very sexy looking packages, which are being sold quite hard - so someone's making a lot of money out of them.

I was thinking about a much simpler (hi tech / lo tech) system, involving PVs on the roof, no fancy plumbing; just a suitable, low voltage, immersion heater in the existing hot tank. At around £1k for 200W, with no regulation or fancy control needed, you're talking about a payback time of less than 10 years (less if you could only get a cheaper source of PV panels), it would sound to me to be very DIY manageable. Can anyone think of any serious snags? I can't think that a 200W heater would ever produce an embarrassing amount of hot water- and it could always be turned off! PVs don't freeze and a few metres of thick cable would be very easy to run. It seems so obvious?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
sophiecentaur said:
I keep thinking of doing something with Solar Power. (Southern UK)
The easiest, conceptually would be very basic homemade thermal panels but then there's the problem of how to use the hot (warm) water. That involves plumbing and a special hot tank.
Once you've gone for that, you may as well spend more and get the high performance 'tubes' and it gets really expensive - even when you shop around.

If you go for the PV solution, then people think in terms of going the whole hog, getting connected to the Grid and selling what you don't use. This seems to be flavour of the month and there are many very sexy looking packages, which are being sold quite hard - so someone's making a lot of money out of them.

I was thinking about a much simpler (hi tech / lo tech) system, involving PVs on the roof, no fancy plumbing; just a suitable, low voltage, immersion heater in the existing hot tank. At around £1k for 200W, with no regulation or fancy control needed, you're talking about a payback time of less than 10 years (less if you could only get a cheaper source of PV panels), it would sound to me to be very DIY manageable. Can anyone think of any serious snags? I can't think that a 200W heater would ever produce an embarrassing amount of hot water- and it could always be turned off! PVs don't freeze and a few metres of thick cable would be very easy to run. It seems so obvious?

Sophicentaur,what are PVs?
I googled and and amongst other things the following came up:
performance vauxhall show
persistent vegetative state
pig veterinary society
I doubt if it's any of the above.:-p

Sorry I found it.I should have googled PV cells(photovoltaic)
 
Last edited:
I think the first thing needed is for you to do some research and do your sums.
What is the cost per square metre of cell.
How efficient are the cells and what is the average expected power output.
What are the installation costs etc.
 
Dadface said:
I think the first thing needed is for you to do some research and do your sums.
What is the cost per square metre of cell.
How efficient are the cells and what is the average expected power output.
What are the installation costs etc.

Exactly.
Installation is about as cheap as it could be. As I said "a few metres of heavy cable". Fitting an extra heating element could involve removing the tank and putting in a suitable flange (soft solder is easy peasy).

Efficiency is not 'really' relevant as I would be getting 200W (don't care about the area, particularly) or less, depending on the angle of the Sun etc. My 10 year payback time is accurate enough assuming the prices I have seen so far.

So, I've really done all you say and I'm interested in any personal experience or exta input.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K