Is Velocity Equal to Work Divided by Impulse in Physics?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter lonelypancreas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
6 replies · 2K views
lonelypancreas
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
Since Work = F*delta(d) and Impulse = F*delta(t) then dividing work over impulse, through simple cancellation of F we can say that it is now equal to delta d / delta t which is equal to velocity right? My question is, does this make sense "physics-wise" since I onlu arrived at my answer through cancellations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi lonely:

Your equations should be:
delta(Work) = F*delta(d)
delta(Impulse) = F*delta(t)​

delta(Work) is an infinitesimal of Work = an infinitesimal of energy = ΔE
delta(Impulse) is an infinitesimal of Impulse = an infinitesimal of momentum = Δp​

From
In empty space, the photon moves at c (the speed of light) and its energy and momentum are related by E = pc, where p is the https://www.physicsforums.com/javascript:void(0) of the momentum vector p.

Consider a photon which has momentum p and energy pc.
The result of dividing the photon's energy by its momentum gives its velocity c.

Hope this helps.

Regards,
Buzz
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lonelypancreas
E = pc is the same as E = (mc)c --> E = mc^2 right? I still haven't encountered relativity so I'm not quite familiar with that famous equation but I think through your answer, it made sense. Thanks.
 
lonelypancreas said:
Since Work = F*delta(d) and Impulse = F*delta(t) then dividing work over impulse, through simple cancellation of F we can say that it is now equal to delta d / delta t which is equal to velocity right? My question is, does this make sense "physics-wise" since I onlu arrived at my answer through cancellations?

If you have ##KE = \frac{1}{2}mv^2## and ##p = mv##, then

##\frac{KE}{p} = \frac{1}{2}v##

And:

##KE = \frac{p^2}{2m}##

You might like to think about why

##v \ne Work/Impulse##
 
lonelypancreas said:
E = pc is the same as E = (mc)c --> E = mc^2 right?

No, because p ≠ mc.

The general relativistic relationship between energy, momentum and (rest) mass is E2 = (pc)2 + (mc2)2. Set m = 0 and you get E = pc.
 
Given this was a post on classical mechanics in the Classical Physics section, I'm not sure how we ended up talking about relativity!
 
PeroK said:
Given this was a post on classical mechanics in the Classical Physics section, I'm not sure how we ended up talking about relativity!

Because this is PF. You can't write down an inclined plane problem without someone chiming in about GR.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mondayman and DrClaude