Is VI=P strictly an ohmic relation

  • Thread starter Thread starter hover
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the equation VI=P, which calculates power, strictly applies to ohmic devices or extends to non-ohmic components like light bulbs. It is clarified that while light bulbs do not follow Ohm's Law linearly due to varying resistance with temperature, the equation still holds true at any moment in time. The relationship between voltage, current, and power remains valid even for non-ohmic devices, as power can be calculated using the instantaneous values of voltage and current. For circuits with reactive components, the equation adapts to include complex impedances, maintaining its applicability. Overall, VI=P is a versatile equation that applies to both ohmic and non-ohmic circuits.
hover
Messages
342
Reaction score
0
Is VI=P strictly an ohmic relation or does it apply to all types of circuits?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


hover said:
Is VI=P strictly an ohmic relation or does it apply to all types of circuits?

Thanks

What is the context of the question?
 


berkeman said:
What is the context of the question?

I'm just wondering if this equation predicts the power for any given circuit. Not just resistors but light bulbs and things that aren't Ohmic in nature.
 


I want to know if a light bulb given a certain voltage and current will have VI=P power even thought the lighbulb isn't ohmic.
 


power = volts x current is true at any point in time. Various components will affect how the power varies over time.
 


So it doesn't matter whether the device is ohmic or not?
 


hover said:
So it doesn't matter whether the device is ohmic or not?

What do you mean by "ohmic"? Do you mean a power factor = 1?
 


berkeman said:
What do you mean by "ohmic"? Do you mean a power factor = 1?

I mean does the object have to follow ohms law V=IR?
 


hover said:
I mean does the object have to follow ohms law V=IR?

I'm not trying to be dense here, but I'm still not quite understanding. Do you mean where "R" is not a complex impedance? Could you please give an example of something that doesn't "follow Ohm's Law"? Thanks.
 
  • #10


berkeman said:
I'm not trying to be dense here, but I'm still not quite understanding. Do you mean where "R" is not a complex impedance? Could you please give an example of something that doesn't "follow Ohm's Law"? Thanks.

Something like a light bulb. As the voltage increases, the resistance the lightbulb has isn't linear.
 
  • #11


hover said:
Something like a light bulb. As the voltage increases, the resistance the lightbulb has isn't linear.

Ah. The resistance of the filimant varies with temperature (this is true of most conductors BTW). It doesn't vary with voltage, per se. A higher voltage causes a larger current to flow, which heats up the filament more, which changes its resistance. V=IR is true at any moment in time, even during the transients like at turn on or if you increase the voltage once the bulb is on.

Do you have another example of what you would consider non-Ohmic?
 
  • #12
berkeman said:
Ah. The resistance of the filimant varies with temperature (this is true of most conductors BTW). It doesn't vary with voltage, per se. A higher voltage causes a larger current to flow, which heats up the filament more, which changes its resistance. V=IR is true at any moment in time, even during the transients like at turn on or if you increase the voltage once the bulb is on.

Do you have another example of what you would consider non-Ohmic?

That was basically it. So I'm guessing that VI=R does work for something like a light bulb right?
 
  • #13


hover said:
That was basically it. So I'm guessing that VI=R does work for something like a light bulb right?

Yes, absolutely.

For circuits that have reactive devices like inductors and capacitors, the simple linear V=IR Ohm's Law equation is extended to include complex impedances. The equation still works, but "R" --> Z where Z is a complex number.
 
  • #14
berkeman said:
Yes, absolutely.

For circuits that have reactive devices like inductors and capacitors, the simple linear V=IR Ohm's Law equation is extended to include complex impedances. The equation still works, but "R" --> Z where Z is a complex number.

Good! That clears everything up. Thanks! :)
 
Back
Top