Is Voyager 40k years from a star?

AI Thread Summary
Voyager 1 is projected to pass near the star AC +79 3888, located 17.6 light years away, in approximately 40,000 years. Initial calculations suggested it would take around 319,000 years to travel that distance at 35,000 mph, but this estimate does not account for the star's movement towards the solar system. The star's radial velocity of about 119 km/s significantly shortens the distance Voyager will actually cover by the time it approaches. Additionally, there was confusion regarding the current distance of Voyager from Earth, which is approximately 37 hours for a round trip light signal, not 18 minutes. Overall, the article's timeline may be accurate when considering these factors.
Rob Haskell
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Greetings! I read this article on line, where it states that Voyager 1 has an appointment with a star, AC +79 3888, which is 17.6 light years away, in 40,000 years. However, if voyager is traveling at 35,000 mph, that number seems off. Shouldn't it be 319,000 years to travel that distance?

I'm only asking because I only barely know what I'm doing here...

My calculation:

35000 mph = 328,320,000 mp/year
6T / 328,320,000 =18,274 years to travel 1 ly
18,274 * 17.5 = 319,795

http://www.space.com/22783-voyager-1-interstellar-space-star-flyby.html

PS - I'm not accounting for time traveled, since it is only about 18 light minutes.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Rob Haskell said:
Greetings! I read this article on line, where it states that Voyager 1 has an appointment with a star, AC +79 3888, which is 17.6 light years away, in 40,000 years. However, if voyager is traveling at 35,000 mph, that number seems off. Shouldn't it be 319,000 years to travel that distance?

I'm only asking because I only barely know what I'm doing here...

My calculation:

35000 mph = 328,320,000 mp/year
6T / 328,320,000 =18,274 years to travel 1 ly
18,274 * 17.5 = 319,795

http://www.space.com/22783-voyager-1-interstellar-space-star-flyby.html

PS - I'm not accounting for time traveled, since it is only about 18 light minutes.

The article states that the probe will approach short of a light year to the star, further, the timeline could still be correct if the star systems is moving towards the projected path of the probe. (I haven't verified it)

The calculation needs to take account of these things.

The probe is also further than 18 light minutes, perhaps you meant hours.
 
The star mentioned has a radial velocity of ~119 km/s towards the solar system. When you factor that in, you get the 40,000 yr figure ( by the time Voyager passes it, it will only be 1.73 ly from the Solar system.
 
  • Like
Likes Geology Erwin
It is perhaps worth pointing out that when Voyager 1 is at its closest to Gliese 445 it's still roughly half-way between the sun and this star.
 
  • Like
Likes Rob Haskell
Janus said:
The star mentioned has a radial velocity of ~119 km/s towards the solar system. When you factor that in, you get the 40,000 yr figure ( by the time Voyager passes it, it will only be 1.73 ly from the Solar system.
Ok. That's cool. Thanks!
 
Student100 said:
The probe is also further than 18 light minutes, perhaps you meant hours.

Yes. After all, the Earth is about 8 light-minutes from the sun. :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes Rob Haskell
So basically the article is a bit misleading by mentioning the the current distance to Gliese 445 by not mentioning that it is moving towards the solar system. Understandable, of course, as it a pop level article.
 
A couple of you mentioned the question of how far v1 is right now from earth. I got my info from the Voyager odometer:

http://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/where/

It lists light round trip time at 37 minutes. That would be 18.5 light minutes distance? Or am I misreading this?
 
Rob Haskell said:
A couple of you mentioned the question of how far v1 is right now from earth. I got my info from the Voyager odometer:

http://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/where/

It lists light round trip time at 37 minutes. That would be 18.5 light minutes distance? Or am I misreading this?
Yes you are. The round trip time is 37 hours, 13 minutes, 14 seconds. That's why there's that hh:mm:ss printed below the numbers..
 
  • Like
Likes Rob Haskell
  • #10
  • Like
Likes PeroK
  • #11
SteamKing said:
Yes you are. The round trip time is 37 hours, 13 minutes, 14 seconds. That's why there's that hh:mm:ss printed below the numbers..

Yikes... total brain fart there. Thanks SteamKing
 
  • #12
SteamKing said:
Here's a handy table of the time is takes light to reach each of the planets in the solar system after leaving the sun:

http://image.gsfc.nasa.gov/poetry/venus/q89.html

Note Pluto is about 5.5 light hours from the sun, one-way.
Just for "completion":
Kuiper Belt ≈ 35 - 80 AU ≈ 5 - 11 Lh
Eris ≈ 68 AU ≈ 9.4 Lh
Oort Cloud ≈ 1.6 Ly
 
  • Like
Likes Rob Haskell
Back
Top