Is water still water after it evaporates or H and O?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gary350
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the process of breaking down water into hydrogen and oxygen, with electrolysis being highlighted as a common method. There are claims about using high-frequency techniques for easier breakdown, but specific frequencies are not provided. The conversation also explores the potential of breaking down steam, moisture, ice, and air under various conditions like vacuum or pressure. Additionally, it notes that water can contribute to fuel in extremely hot industrial fires, as it decomposes into hydrogen and oxygen at high temperatures. Overall, the thread seeks effective methods for extracting hydrogen from water.
gary350
Messages
276
Reaction score
75
I am fishing for ideas about turning water into Hydrogen and Oxygen.

Electrolis of water seems to be the preferred way to break down H0H into H and O. I see several claims online that claim water breaks down easy when using high frequency but they refuse to tell what frequency works best. Does that really work?

What about electrolis of steam, moisture, ice, air, in a vacuum or under pressure?

I read the fire department does not put water on extremely hot industrial fires at about 5000 degrees water breaks down to H and O and adds fuel to the fire.

Is there an easy way to break down water to get the Hydrogen?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top