Is Zero Acceleration Indicative of Zero Speed?

AI Thread Summary
Zero acceleration indicates that an object's speed is constant, but it does not imply that the speed itself is zero. The relationship between position, velocity, and acceleration is defined through derivatives, where velocity is the derivative of position and acceleration is the derivative of velocity. If acceleration is zero, the velocity remains constant, which can be any non-zero value. Understanding this distinction clarifies that while acceleration being zero means no change in speed, it does not mean speed is necessarily zero.
robothito
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello this is my first post here.

I have studied quite maths and physics when I was young and I was quite good about it but now I am stucked by a very very basic question so much that I feel like a fool and I am even ashamed to be asking it here but I would very much appreciate if someone help me

My problem is with speed and acceleration. I am reading now a paper on this and I am trying to understand what it says

Homework Equations



ω(t)=∫ω.τ= ω.t

The Attempt at a Solution


Now I know (or at least remember) that Δω/Δt=ω. right? Acceleration is the change of speed. So far so good. If my acceleration is 0 then the change of speed is 0 too, (meaning the speed is constant) ,. Makes sense.
If I apply integration to Δω and Δt then I suppose I get something like the equation above...

but that blew me up... in the equation above, if ω. is 0 (accel is 0) then ω(t)=0 right? that doesn't make sense! because speed is not 0!

What in my line of reasoning is a mistake?

I know it must be the most foolish question but Please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
robothito said:

Homework Statement


Hello this is my first post here.

I have studied quite maths and physics when I was young and I was quite good about it but now I am stucked by a very very basic question so much that I feel like a fool and I am even ashamed to be asking it here but I would very much appreciate if someone help me

My problem is with speed and acceleration. I am reading now a paper on this and I am trying to understand what it says

Homework Equations



ω(t)=∫ω.τ= ω.t

The Attempt at a Solution


Now I know (or at least remember) that Δω/Δt=ω. right? Acceleration is the change of speed. So far so good. If my acceleration is 0 then the change of speed is 0 too, (meaning the speed is constant) ,. Makes sense.
If I apply integration to Δω and Δt then I suppose I get something like the equation above...

but that blew me up... in the equation above, if ω. is 0 (accel is 0) then ω(t)=0 right? that doesn't make sense! because speed is not 0!

What in my line of reasoning is a mistake?

I know it must be the most foolish question but Please help

I don't know where you found the equation in section 2, but it's meaningless. It's not in the proper form for an integral anyway.

In most physics work, angular motion and rectilinear motion are analyzed separately, even though the basic equations for each type of motion are similar in structure.

For rectilinear motion, which is motion in a straight line, we are dealing with the position of a body, call this s(t); its velocity, v(t); and its acceleration, a(t). All of these properties of the body, namely position, velocity, and acceleration, are functions of time, which is why the '(t)' is used.

Now, the velocity of a body is the change of its position with respect to time, just like the acceleration is the change in velocity with respect to time.

We indicate these changes by using derivatives like so:

##v(t)=\frac{d\,s(t)}{dt}## and ##a(t) = \frac{d\,v(t)}{dt}##

If we know the position of a body as a function of time, we can calculate its velocity and acceleration using the equations above. Further, if the velocity is constant, this implies that the acceleration is zero, since a constant velocity does not change with respect to time. Ditto for the position of a body. If position does not change, then velocity is zero since there is no movement.

But what if we know only the acceleration of the body and we want to calculate its velocity and find its position? Then, we work backwards, like so:

##v(t) = \int a(t) \,dt + C_1## and

##s(t) = \int v(t) \,dt + C_1 ⋅ t + C_2##

The constants of integration, C1 and C2, can be worked out if we know some extra details about the initial motion of the body, namely its initial velocity and initial position.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top