Explaining the Relation Between \gamma N_+ and 2N_{++}+N_{+-}

  • Thread starter Thread starter matematikuvol
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relation
matematikuvol
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
One line between (+-). Two lines between (++). Zero line between (--). \gamma number of nearest neighbours. Why we have relation

\gamma N_+=2N_{++}+N_{+-}

Why we get this? Some explanation. This is from Kerson Huang.
 

Attachments

  • ising.JPG
    ising.JPG
    6.9 KB · Views: 545
Physics news on Phys.org
Choose a + site. Join it to each neighbor by a line. we need to draw gamma lines. Now do this for all + sites. So total lines = gamma*N(+). In this process i) between any (+,+) pair there will be two lines (one when we draw line from 1st + to 2nd +, other when we draw line from 2nd + to 1st +). Now there are N(++) number of (+,+) pair. So total lines between all (+,+) pair is 2N(++).. ii) between any (+,-) pair there will be one line (when drawn from + to -). There are N(+-) number of (+,-) pair. iii) between any (-,-) pair there will be no line. So total lines = 2N(++) + N(+-).
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top