Isn't this weird? (convergence of a sequence)

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence Weird
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the convergence of the sequence {n^2/(n^2+4)} to 1 using the epsilon-N definition. The argument suggests that demonstrating convergence to 1 is equivalent to showing convergence to any positive real number 'a', which raises questions about the uniqueness of the limit. It is noted that for small values of n, such as n=1, the inequality fails, complicating the proof. The conclusion emphasizes that while the sequence converges, establishing that it converges specifically to 1 requires careful consideration, ultimately leading to a derived condition for N. The final assertion is that any N satisfying N ≥ 2/√ε is sufficient for proving convergence.
quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
In order to prove, using the \epsilon-N definition, that the sequence

\left\{\frac{n^2}{n^2+4}\right\} = \left\{\frac{1}{1+\frac{4}{n^2}}\right\}

converges towards 1, I did the following: The sequence converges towards 1 if

\forall \epsilon>0, \exists N\in\mathbb{R} \ \mbox{such that} \ \forall n\in\mathbb{N}, n>N \Longrightarrow \left|\frac{1}{1+\frac{4}{n^2}}-1\right|<\epsilon

We have that

\left|\frac{1}{1+\frac{4}{n^2}}-1\right|<\left|\frac{1}{1+\frac{4}{n^2}}\right|

so if we can find the N for the creature on the right side of the inequality, it will also be true for the one on the left side. And then we solve and I spare you the following steps because my question is that if my line of reasoning is correct so far, then proving that there exist an N for the right member proves that there exists an N for

\left|\frac{1}{1+\frac{4}{n^2}}-a\right|

where a in any positive real. So it doesn't REALLY show that the limit is 1 because should I try to prove that the limit is "a, any positive real", I would arrive to the same answer! All it shows is that the sequence converges. Right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
quasar987 said:
We have that

\left|\frac{1}{1+\frac{4}{n^2}}-1\right|<\left|\frac{1}{1+\frac{4}{n^2}}\right|

Actually, we don't. n=1 fails. For large enough n (3 or more), this inequality will be true.

However, you won't be able to bound the right hand thing above by an arbitrary \epsilon>0. Forget an arbitrary one, take \epsilon =1/5 and you won't be able to do it, since it's false for all n (any epsilon less than 1 will also fail).This thing starts at 1/5 and approaches 1, it's not getting arbitrarily small.
 
quasar987 said:
...

We have that

\left|\frac{1}{1+\frac{4}{n^2}}-1\right|<\left|\frac{1}{1+\frac{4}{n^2}}\right|

so if we can find the N for the creature on the right side of the inequality, it will also be true for the one on the left side.

But can you ? Notice that this creature doesn't get smaller than 1/5...ever.

PS : shmoe's post wasn't up when I started...so ignore this.
 
Last edited:
Ok, thanks for pointing that out. I start again.

The sequence converges towards 1 if

\forall \epsilon>0, \exists N\in\mathbb{R} \ \mbox{such that} \ \forall n\in\mathbb{N}, n>N \Longrightarrow \left|\frac{n^2}{n^2+4}-1\right|<\epsilon

We have that (with some luck),

\left|\frac{n^2}{n^2+4}-1\right|<\left|n^2-1\right|<\left|n^2\right|=n^2

which is an easily tamed creature that produces an N that is true for all N such that

N\geq \frac{1}{\sqrt{\epsilon}}

So my argument remains, that is to say, isn't it weird that since showing that this converges to 1 is the same as showing that it converges to any a, positive real. So it doesn't REALLY show that the limit is 1 because should I try to prove that the limit is "a, any positive real", I would arrive to the same answer! All it shows is that the sequence converges. Right?
 
quasar987 said:
We have that (with some luck),

\left|\frac{n^2}{n^2+4}-1\right|<\left|n^2-1\right|<\left|n^2\right|

It's going to take a lot more than "some" luck !

Try n=1 and see what happens.

And I suggest you don't spend a whole lot of time trying more of these ...any such attempt must fail.
 
Last edited:
Bad luck!

I found another way of doing it (thanks to Fredrik's trick) that DOESN'T "cause" the paradox I was invoking, so it should be right this time! (notice I used the word "should" :wink:). Here we go again.

We have that, *crossing my fingers*

\left|\frac{n^2}{n^2+4}-1\right|=\left|\frac{n^2+4-4}{n^2+4}-1\right|=\left|1-\frac{4}{n^2+4}-1\right|=\left|-\frac{4}{n^2+4}\right|=\frac{4}{n^2+4}<\frac{4}{n^2}<\epsilon
\Leftrightarrow n^2>\frac{4}{\epsilon}\Leftrightarrow n>\sqrt{\frac{4}{\epsilon}}

we discarded the option that n was greater than minus the square root because it is trivial by n being a positive interger. So any N satisfying

N\geq \frac{2}{\sqrt{\epsilon}}

is fine.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top