jxj
- 18
- 2
Homework Statement
So the problem is trying to isolate mA
Homework Equations
The Attempt at a Solution
am pretty lost. I believe you have to divide the primes? I am unsure
The discussion focuses on isolating the variable mA in the momentum equation, specifically addressing the confusion around handling prime variables vA and vB. Participants emphasize the importance of rearranging the equation to group all terms containing mA on one side and the remaining terms on the other. The correct approach involves using the distributive property to simplify the expression, ultimately leading to a single instance of mA in the equation.
PREREQUISITESStudents studying physics, particularly those focusing on momentum equations, as well as educators and tutors assisting with algebraic manipulation in physical contexts.
You may be misinterpreting that. Ignore it and see where you get to.jxj said:My teacher said because the vA and vB on the right were prime they could not be combined
when doing this, don't you divide the ##m_\mathrm{A}## plus ##v_\mathrm{A}## prime on the right by its counterpart on the left first? even though it contains a prime?DrClaude said:Start by putting all terms containing ##m_\mathrm{A}## on the left-hand side, and all other terms on the right-hand side.
ok thanksharuspex said:You may be misinterpreting that. Ignore it and see where you get to.
No, I wouldn't divide yet, I would simply start by sorting the terms. When you have an equation likejxj said:when doing this, don't you divide the ##m_\mathrm{A}## plus ##v_\mathrm{A}## prime on the right by its counterpart on the left first?
ok so right now I am a little confused because unlike the example you gave with 5x, the formula is essentially equal on both sides minus the primes. in my mind I would try to cross out the mAvA on the right, is that right?DrClaude said:No, I wouldn't divide yet, I would simply start by sorting the terms. When you have an equation like
$$
5x -3 = 2x + 1
$$
the first step is to try and gather all terms in ##x## together, and leave the rest on the other side,
$$
\begin{align*}
5x - 3 -2x +3 &= 2x + 1 - 2x + 3 \\
3x &= 4
\end{align*}
$$
I tried putting all of mA on the left and I got to mAvA - mAvA (prime) = mBvB (prime) - mBvB did I mess up?DrClaude said:No, I wouldn't divide yet, I would simply start by sorting the terms. When you have an equation like
$$
5x -3 = 2x + 1
$$
the first step is to try and gather all terms in ##x## together, and leave the rest on the other side,
$$
\begin{align*}
5x - 3 -2x +3 &= 2x + 1 - 2x + 3 \\
3x &= 4
\end{align*}
$$
jxj said:I tried putting all of mA on the left and I got to mAvA - mAvA (prime) = mBvB (prime) - mBvB did I mess up?
Factorise each side.jxj said:I tried putting all of mA on the left and I got to mAvA - mAvA (prime) = mBvB (prime) - mBvB did I mess up?
when you say factorise could you explain a little more pleaseharuspex said:Factorise each side.
You want to go from ##m_\mathrm{A} v_\mathrm{A} - m_\mathrm{A} v_\mathrm{A}'## to an expression where ##m_\mathrm{A}## appears only once, using the distributive property of multiplication.jxj said:when you say factorise could you explain a little more please
thanks!DrClaude said:You want to go from ##m_\mathrm{A} v_\mathrm{A} - m_\mathrm{A} v_\mathrm{A}'## to an expression where ##m_\mathrm{A}## appears only once, using the distributive property of multiplication.
so right now I am at distributing mA by itself into (vA - mAv’A) on the left of the equal sign and vice versa for mB on the right of the equal sign. am I on the right track?DrClaude said:You want to go from ##m_\mathrm{A} v_\mathrm{A} - m_\mathrm{A} v_\mathrm{A}'## to an expression where ##m_\mathrm{A}## appears only once, using the distributive property of multiplication.
Check that part I highlighted in red.jxj said:so right now I am at distributing mA by itself into (vA - mAv’A) on the left of the equal sign and vice versa for mB on the right of the equal sign.
for that part, was I supposed to separate them so I would have mA(vA) -(mA)(v’A) ?DrClaude said:Check that part I highlighted in red.
No, you want a single ##m_\mathrm{A}##. You need to do the inverse of distribution:jxj said:for that part, was I supposed to separate them so I would have mA(vA) -(mA)(v’A) ?