Isolating Variable in Equation for conservation of momentum

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on isolating the variable mA in the momentum equation, specifically addressing the confusion around handling prime variables vA and vB. Participants emphasize the importance of rearranging the equation to group all terms containing mA on one side and the remaining terms on the other. The correct approach involves using the distributive property to simplify the expression, ultimately leading to a single instance of mA in the equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of momentum equations in physics
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation techniques
  • Knowledge of the distributive property in mathematics
  • Ability to work with prime notation in equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of momentum conservation in physics
  • Learn advanced algebraic techniques for isolating variables
  • Explore the distributive property and its applications in equations
  • Practice solving equations with prime variables in physics contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on momentum equations, as well as educators and tutors assisting with algebraic manipulation in physical contexts.

jxj
Messages
18
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


So the problem is trying to isolate mA
equations-of-conservation-of-momentum-energy.png
in the equation for momentum (only focusing on top formula, not bottom hehe) basically by solving the equation I assume. My teacher said because the vA and vB on the right were prime they could not be combined so I'm having trouble computing it. Please help!

Homework Equations



equations-of-conservation-of-momentum-energy.png

The Attempt at a Solution


am pretty lost. I believe you have to divide the primes? I am unsure
 

Attachments

  • equations-of-conservation-of-momentum-energy.png
    equations-of-conservation-of-momentum-energy.png
    4.3 KB · Views: 14,471
  • equations-of-conservation-of-momentum-energy.png
    equations-of-conservation-of-momentum-energy.png
    4.3 KB · Views: 2,899
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by putting all terms containing ##m_\mathrm{A}## on the left-hand side, and all other terms on the right-hand side.
 
  • Like
Likes jxj
jxj said:
My teacher said because the vA and vB on the right were prime they could not be combined
You may be misinterpreting that. Ignore it and see where you get to.
 
  • Like
Likes jxj
DrClaude said:
Start by putting all terms containing ##m_\mathrm{A}## on the left-hand side, and all other terms on the right-hand side.
when doing this, don't you divide the ##m_\mathrm{A}## plus ##v_\mathrm{A}## prime on the right by its counterpart on the left first? even though it contains a prime?
 
haruspex said:
You may be misinterpreting that. Ignore it and see where you get to.
ok thanks
 
jxj said:
when doing this, don't you divide the ##m_\mathrm{A}## plus ##v_\mathrm{A}## prime on the right by its counterpart on the left first?
No, I wouldn't divide yet, I would simply start by sorting the terms. When you have an equation like
$$
5x -3 = 2x + 1
$$
the first step is to try and gather all terms in ##x## together, and leave the rest on the other side,
$$
\begin{align*}
5x - 3 -2x +3 &= 2x + 1 - 2x + 3 \\
3x &= 4
\end{align*}
$$
 
DrClaude said:
No, I wouldn't divide yet, I would simply start by sorting the terms. When you have an equation like
$$
5x -3 = 2x + 1
$$
the first step is to try and gather all terms in ##x## together, and leave the rest on the other side,
$$
\begin{align*}
5x - 3 -2x +3 &= 2x + 1 - 2x + 3 \\
3x &= 4
\end{align*}
$$
ok so right now I am a little confused because unlike the example you gave with 5x, the formula is essentially equal on both sides minus the primes. in my mind I would try to cross out the mAvA on the right, is that right?
 
DrClaude said:
No, I wouldn't divide yet, I would simply start by sorting the terms. When you have an equation like
$$
5x -3 = 2x + 1
$$
the first step is to try and gather all terms in ##x## together, and leave the rest on the other side,
$$
\begin{align*}
5x - 3 -2x +3 &= 2x + 1 - 2x + 3 \\
3x &= 4
\end{align*}
$$
I tried putting all of mA on the left and I got to mAvA - mAvA (prime) = mBvB (prime) - mBvB did I mess up?
 
jxj said:
I tried putting all of mA on the left and I got to mAvA - mAvA (prime) = mBvB (prime) - mBvB did I mess up?

No, that's correct. How you want to think of it is doing the same thing to both sides. So to move "m_a v'_a" to the left, subtract it from both sides. Or if it was multiplied by that, you would divide it on both sides.
 
  • Like
Likes jxj
  • #10
jxj said:
I tried putting all of mA on the left and I got to mAvA - mAvA (prime) = mBvB (prime) - mBvB did I mess up?
Factorise each side.
 
  • Like
Likes jxj
  • #11
haruspex said:
Factorise each side.
when you say factorise could you explain a little more please
 
  • #12
jxj said:
when you say factorise could you explain a little more please
You want to go from ##m_\mathrm{A} v_\mathrm{A} - m_\mathrm{A} v_\mathrm{A}'## to an expression where ##m_\mathrm{A}## appears only once, using the distributive property of multiplication.
 
  • #13
DrClaude said:
You want to go from ##m_\mathrm{A} v_\mathrm{A} - m_\mathrm{A} v_\mathrm{A}'## to an expression where ##m_\mathrm{A}## appears only once, using the distributive property of multiplication.
thanks!
 
  • #14
DrClaude said:
You want to go from ##m_\mathrm{A} v_\mathrm{A} - m_\mathrm{A} v_\mathrm{A}'## to an expression where ##m_\mathrm{A}## appears only once, using the distributive property of multiplication.
so right now I am at distributing mA by itself into (vA - mAv’A) on the left of the equal sign and vice versa for mB on the right of the equal sign. am I on the right track?
 
  • #15
jxj said:
so right now I am at distributing mA by itself into (vA - mAv’A) on the left of the equal sign and vice versa for mB on the right of the equal sign.
Check that part I highlighted in red.
 
  • Like
Likes jxj
  • #16
DrClaude said:
Check that part I highlighted in red.
for that part, was I supposed to separate them so I would have mA(vA) -(mA)(v’A) ?
 
  • #17
jxj said:
for that part, was I supposed to separate them so I would have mA(vA) -(mA)(v’A) ?
No, you want a single ##m_\mathrm{A}##. You need to do the inverse of distribution:
$$
a (b+c) = ab + ac
$$
 
  • Like
Likes jxj

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
13K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K