Isolating Variable in Equation for conservation of momentum

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves isolating the variable mA in the context of the conservation of momentum equation. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the treatment of terms with primes and the overall approach to rearranging the equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss moving terms involving mA to one side of the equation and question the implications of the prime notation on the velocities. There are attempts to clarify the process of isolating mA and the steps involved in rearranging the equation.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering guidance on how to rearrange the equation and questioning assumptions about the treatment of terms. There is a focus on ensuring that mA appears only once in the final expression, with various interpretations of the steps being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of confusion regarding the treatment of terms with primes and the implications for the isolation of mA. The original poster is navigating the constraints of the problem while seeking clarity on the mathematical process involved.

jxj
Messages
18
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


So the problem is trying to isolate mA
equations-of-conservation-of-momentum-energy.png
in the equation for momentum (only focusing on top formula, not bottom hehe) basically by solving the equation I assume. My teacher said because the vA and vB on the right were prime they could not be combined so I'm having trouble computing it. Please help!

Homework Equations



equations-of-conservation-of-momentum-energy.png

The Attempt at a Solution


am pretty lost. I believe you have to divide the primes? I am unsure
 

Attachments

  • equations-of-conservation-of-momentum-energy.png
    equations-of-conservation-of-momentum-energy.png
    4.3 KB · Views: 14,500
  • equations-of-conservation-of-momentum-energy.png
    equations-of-conservation-of-momentum-energy.png
    4.3 KB · Views: 3,038
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by putting all terms containing ##m_\mathrm{A}## on the left-hand side, and all other terms on the right-hand side.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jxj
jxj said:
My teacher said because the vA and vB on the right were prime they could not be combined
You may be misinterpreting that. Ignore it and see where you get to.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jxj
DrClaude said:
Start by putting all terms containing ##m_\mathrm{A}## on the left-hand side, and all other terms on the right-hand side.
when doing this, don't you divide the ##m_\mathrm{A}## plus ##v_\mathrm{A}## prime on the right by its counterpart on the left first? even though it contains a prime?
 
haruspex said:
You may be misinterpreting that. Ignore it and see where you get to.
ok thanks
 
jxj said:
when doing this, don't you divide the ##m_\mathrm{A}## plus ##v_\mathrm{A}## prime on the right by its counterpart on the left first?
No, I wouldn't divide yet, I would simply start by sorting the terms. When you have an equation like
$$
5x -3 = 2x + 1
$$
the first step is to try and gather all terms in ##x## together, and leave the rest on the other side,
$$
\begin{align*}
5x - 3 -2x +3 &= 2x + 1 - 2x + 3 \\
3x &= 4
\end{align*}
$$
 
DrClaude said:
No, I wouldn't divide yet, I would simply start by sorting the terms. When you have an equation like
$$
5x -3 = 2x + 1
$$
the first step is to try and gather all terms in ##x## together, and leave the rest on the other side,
$$
\begin{align*}
5x - 3 -2x +3 &= 2x + 1 - 2x + 3 \\
3x &= 4
\end{align*}
$$
ok so right now I am a little confused because unlike the example you gave with 5x, the formula is essentially equal on both sides minus the primes. in my mind I would try to cross out the mAvA on the right, is that right?
 
DrClaude said:
No, I wouldn't divide yet, I would simply start by sorting the terms. When you have an equation like
$$
5x -3 = 2x + 1
$$
the first step is to try and gather all terms in ##x## together, and leave the rest on the other side,
$$
\begin{align*}
5x - 3 -2x +3 &= 2x + 1 - 2x + 3 \\
3x &= 4
\end{align*}
$$
I tried putting all of mA on the left and I got to mAvA - mAvA (prime) = mBvB (prime) - mBvB did I mess up?
 
jxj said:
I tried putting all of mA on the left and I got to mAvA - mAvA (prime) = mBvB (prime) - mBvB did I mess up?

No, that's correct. How you want to think of it is doing the same thing to both sides. So to move "m_a v'_a" to the left, subtract it from both sides. Or if it was multiplied by that, you would divide it on both sides.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jxj
  • #10
jxj said:
I tried putting all of mA on the left and I got to mAvA - mAvA (prime) = mBvB (prime) - mBvB did I mess up?
Factorise each side.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jxj
  • #11
haruspex said:
Factorise each side.
when you say factorise could you explain a little more please
 
  • #12
jxj said:
when you say factorise could you explain a little more please
You want to go from ##m_\mathrm{A} v_\mathrm{A} - m_\mathrm{A} v_\mathrm{A}'## to an expression where ##m_\mathrm{A}## appears only once, using the distributive property of multiplication.
 
  • #13
DrClaude said:
You want to go from ##m_\mathrm{A} v_\mathrm{A} - m_\mathrm{A} v_\mathrm{A}'## to an expression where ##m_\mathrm{A}## appears only once, using the distributive property of multiplication.
thanks!
 
  • #14
DrClaude said:
You want to go from ##m_\mathrm{A} v_\mathrm{A} - m_\mathrm{A} v_\mathrm{A}'## to an expression where ##m_\mathrm{A}## appears only once, using the distributive property of multiplication.
so right now I am at distributing mA by itself into (vA - mAv’A) on the left of the equal sign and vice versa for mB on the right of the equal sign. am I on the right track?
 
  • #15
jxj said:
so right now I am at distributing mA by itself into (vA - mAv’A) on the left of the equal sign and vice versa for mB on the right of the equal sign.
Check that part I highlighted in red.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jxj
  • #16
DrClaude said:
Check that part I highlighted in red.
for that part, was I supposed to separate them so I would have mA(vA) -(mA)(v’A) ?
 
  • #17
jxj said:
for that part, was I supposed to separate them so I would have mA(vA) -(mA)(v’A) ?
No, you want a single ##m_\mathrm{A}##. You need to do the inverse of distribution:
$$
a (b+c) = ab + ac
$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jxj

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
13K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K