Isomorphism from <R,+> to <R+,\times>: Proving 1-1 and Onto Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter LMKIYHAQ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isomorphism
LMKIYHAQ
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Is there an isomorphism from <R,+> to <R+,\times> where \phi(r)=0.5^{r} when r \in R?

2. Homework Equations
For an isomorphism I know it is necessary to show there is a 1-1 and onto function. I am unsure if I can use the steps I am trying to use to show it is 1-1.

The Attempt at a Solution



For phi(r)=phi(s) I want to show r=s. Am I able to take the ln (or log?) of both sides to get ln(.05^{r})=ln(0.5^{s})? I am not sure which to use (ln or log) and where these logarithmic functions would be defined since for r=s, r and s are supposed to be real numbers.

Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe try rewriting 0.5^r=0.5^s as 2^r=2^s. This may make things cleaner.
 
I don't know how to make that change?
 
Even if that way does clean it up, is my way of taking ln of both sides wrong?
 
Sure, just use logs. (0.5)^r=(0.5)^s iff r*log(0.5)=s*log(0.5). That shows it 1-1. Is it onto? But 1-1 and onto doesn't make it an isomorphism. You have to prove things like phi(r+s)=phi(r)*phi(s), right?
 
Thanks for the help.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top