Issue with math in physics problem?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fightboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the simplification of a physics equation involving angular velocity (ωiz) and mass terms. The transition from the expression ωiz([(2/5mERE2)/(2/5mERE2) + (2/3mdebrisRE2)]-1) to ωiz([mE/(mE + (5/3mdebris))]-1) is clarified. The key point is that the term (2/5mERE2)/(2/5mERE2) simplifies to 1, and the confusion arises from the interpretation of the fractions. The correct simplification involves recognizing that R_E^2 cancels out, leading to the final form of the equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular velocity in physics
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation of fractions
  • Knowledge of mass terms in physics equations
  • Ability to interpret mathematical expressions accurately
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of angular momentum in physics
  • Learn about algebraic simplification techniques for complex fractions
  • Explore the role of mass in rotational dynamics
  • Review common mistakes in interpreting mathematical expressions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching physics concepts, and anyone involved in solving complex mathematical expressions in physical problems.

fightboy
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Ok so for the problem I'm mainly having trouble with setting up one of the equations.
The solutions manual jumped from:
ωiz([(2/5mERE2)/(2/5mERE2) + (2/3mdebrisRE2)]-1)
to:
ωiz([mE/(mE + (5/3mdebris))]-1)

I placed the brackets to clearly separate the fraction from the -1. Anyways I'm having trouble seeing how the math is done to get from the first equation to the second equation, how was it simplified? If anyone is confused on how i wrote the problem please just ask! Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
fightboy said:
Ok so for the problem I'm mainly having trouble with setting up one of the equations.
The solutions manual jumped from:
ωiz([(2/5mERE2)/(2/5mERE2) + (2/3mdebrisRE2)]-1)
to:
ωiz([mE/(mE + (5/3mdebris))]-1)

I placed the brackets to clearly separate the fraction from the -1. Anyways I'm having trouble seeing how the math is done to get from the first equation to the second equation
These aren't equations - they are expressions.

Inside the parentheses you have (2/5mERE2)/(2/5mERE2), which is just 1.

The fractions you wrote are ambiguous, which doesn't change what I wrote above.
Is the numerator ##\frac{2}{5}m_ER_E^2##
or is it ##\frac{2}{5m_ER_E^2}##?
fightboy said:
, how was it simplified? If anyone is confused on how i wrote the problem please just ask! Thanks!
 
Mark44 said:
These aren't equations - they are expressions.

Inside the parentheses you have (2/5mERE2)/(2/5mERE2), which is just 1.

The fractions you wrote are ambiguous, which doesn't change what I wrote above.
Is the numerator ##\frac{2}{5}m_ER_E^2##
or is it ##\frac{2}{5m_ER_E^2}##?
The numerator is ##\frac{2}{5}m_ER_E^2##. I get that ##\frac{2}{5}m_ER_E^2##/##\frac{2}{5}m_ER_E^2## is equal to 1, I am mainly confused on how (2/3mdebrisRE2) became (5/3mdebris) or if the manual made a mistake.
 
If you put an extra set of parentheses in the original expression, the ##R_E^2##s cancel and you can multiply everything by ##\frac{5}{2}## to get $$\frac{\frac{2}{5}m_ER_E^2}{\frac{2}{5}m_ER_E^2+\frac{2}{3}m_{\text{debris}} R_E^2}=\frac{m_E}{m_E+\frac{5}{3}m_{\text{debris}}}$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K