Issues with my investigation in capacitance

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on the investigation of how dielectric size affects the time constant of capacitors, specifically in the pico farad range. The user consistently measures a time constant of 302 ms, which deviates from theoretical expectations by a factor of ten. The issue is attributed to parasitic capacitance in the setup, compounded by the use of an inaccurate oscilloscope and the presence of stray capacitance due to wiring. Recommendations include using op-amp circuits to isolate capacitance and minimize stray effects.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of capacitor theory and time constant calculations
  • Familiarity with oscilloscope operation and probe compensation
  • Knowledge of parasitic capacitance and its effects on measurements
  • Basic principles of operational amplifier (op-amp) circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Research techniques for measuring small capacitance using op-amps
  • Learn about oscilloscope probe compensation methods
  • Investigate ways to minimize parasitic capacitance in experimental setups
  • Explore the use of Logger Pro for data collection in capacitor experiments
USEFUL FOR

Electronics students, hobbyists experimenting with capacitors, and engineers focused on precision measurements in low-capacitance applications.

Filippo Ficarra
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
This is a simpler issue but I need some help nonetheless. I have been carrying out an investigation on how the dielectric size of a capacitor affects its time constant. In theory the larger the dielectric the smaller the capacitance and therefore the smaller the time constant. However although I am changing my dielectric by 5 mm at a time every single time I have measured the time constant with an oscilloscope I get the same value for the time constant of 302 ms which is also off of the theoretical value by a factor of ten. I think it may be due to the fact that my capacitor is in the pico farad range therefore it is hard to measure acureately.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Filippo Ficarra said:
This is a simpler issue but I need some help nonetheless. I have been carrying out an investigation on how the dielectric size of a capacitor affects its time constant. In theory the larger the dielectric the smaller the capacitance and therefore the smaller the time constant. However although I am changing my dielectric by 5 mm at a time every single time I have measured the time constant with an oscilloscope I get the same value for the time constant of 302 ms which is also off of the theoretical value by a factor of ten. I think it may be due to the fact that my capacitor is in the pico farad range therefore it is hard to measure acureately.
Yes, it sounds like the parasitic capacitance of your setup is too large. Can you post a schematic and picture of your setup? :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Filippo Ficarra
berkeman said:
Yes, it sounds like the parasitic capacitance of your setup is too large. Can you post a schematic and picture of your setup? :smile:
http://imgur.com/a/0Sm5z here is the link to my setup image. The resistor is 100 k ohm btw.
 
Filippo Ficarra said:
http://imgur.com/a/0Sm5z here is the link to my setup image. The resistor is 100 k ohm btw.
Yeah, looks like many tens of pF in just the setup and wiring alone. What are you using for an oscilloscope? Can you compensate the probe capacitance, or are the probes too simple?

You can look into how oscilloscope probe capacitance can be nulled out, to see if you can use a similar technique on your setup (after making all of the connections as small and tight and low-capacitance as possible)...
 
berkeman said:
Yeah, looks like many tens of pF in just the setup and wiring alone. What are you using for an oscilloscope? Can you compensate the probe capacitance, or are the probes too simple?

You can look into how oscilloscope probe capacitance can be nulled out, to see if you can use a similar technique on your setup (after making all of the connections as small and tight and low-capacitance as possible)...
Ok my school did not have an accurate oscilloscope so I am using logger pro to collect my data. I set it to collect 6 seconds and it takes samples every 100 milliseconds while the capacitor discharges. Is it possible that since many wires are involved their is some stray capacitance that is affecting my data?
 
Filippo Ficarra said:
Ok my school did not have an accurate oscilloscope so I am using logger pro to collect my data. I set it to collect 6 seconds and it takes samples every 100 milliseconds while the capacitor discharges. Is it possible that since many wires are involved their is some stray capacitance that is affecting my data?
Yes, that setup will not work for measuring the effects of small capacitors. You could probably measure caps in the several uF range, but not down in the pF range.

Are you familiar with opamp circuits? You could build a circuit with a few opamps that would isolate the capacitance and buffer the signals to minimize the effects of stray capacitance. You could even "bootstrap" the stray capacitance with opamps to effectively null it out... :smile:
 
berkeman said:
Yes, that setup will not work for measuring the effects of small capacitors. You could probably measure caps in the several uF range, but not down in the pF range.

Are you familiar with opamp circuits? You could build a circuit with a few opamps that would isolate the capacitance and buffer the signals to minimize the effects of stray capacitance. You could even "bootstrap" the stray capacitance with opamps to effectively null it out... :smile:
I will look into that but thanks for your help
 
You're welcome. You might try Googling something like Measuring Small Capacitance Using Opamps... :smile:

EDIT -- use Google Images...
 

Similar threads

Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K