Iteration of Euler's phi function

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter huba
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Phi
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the iteration of Euler's totient function, denoted as \varphi(n), and its convergence to 1. The least number of iterations required to reach 1 is represented by h(n), with a conjectured maximum value of n for which h(n)=k being 2×3^{k-1}. Richard K. Guy's work highlights perfect totient numbers, specifically that all powers of 3 are perfect totient numbers. The conversation also explores conjectures regarding the prime factors of numbers in the set M, which consists of integers for which \varphi^{k}(n) = 1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Euler's totient function \varphi(n)
  • Familiarity with number theory concepts, particularly prime numbers
  • Knowledge of mathematical induction and its application
  • Basic comprehension of sequences and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of perfect totient numbers and their implications
  • Explore the conjectures surrounding the set M and its prime factors
  • Study the relationship between Fermat primes and Euler's totient function
  • Investigate the implications of the conjecture by Shapiro (1943) regarding prime numbers in M
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, number theorists, and students interested in advanced properties of the Euler's totient function and its applications in prime factorization.

huba
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Iterating Euler's totient function \varphi(n), it eventually arrives at 1. Let h(n) denote the least number of iterations to arrive at 1. For instance, h(18)=3, ie \varphi^{3}(18)=1. There is a conjecture (or is there a proof?) that the largest n for which h(n)=k is 2\times 3^{k-1}. The only reference I found on the internet was a short note in a comment to Sloane's A007755 (the smallest n for which h(n)=k), saying that the maximum value is of that form.
Although I haven't found a proof, I think that I have at least a simple result, using the 2\times 3^{k-1} form. Richard K. Guy (2004), in "Unsolved Problems in Number Theory", p.149 (haven't read it, found it in Google Book Search) describes perfect totient numbers as those n for which n = \varphi(n) + \varphi^{2}(n) + \varphi^{3}(n) + ... + 2 + 1, and says that all powers of 3 are perfect totient numbers. I haven't seen the proof for all powers of 3 being perfect totient numbers, but I would reason this way:

It is easy to prove by induction that
\sum^{k-1}_{j=0}2\times 3^{j}+1=3^{k}.

As for all x\geq j, \varphi^{j}(2\times 3^{x}) = 2\times 3^{x-j}, and \varphi^{x+1}(2\times 3^{x}) = \varphi(2) = 1,

\sum^{k+1}_{j=1}\varphi^{j}(2\times 3^{k})=3^{k}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The set of the smallest numbers n for which \varphi^{k}(n) = 1 is possibly more interesting. Sloane's http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A007755" lists the first 34 such numbers, or 33 if starting with 2 (I left out 1) :
2, 3, 5, 11, 17, 41, 83, 137, 257, 641, ...
I will refer to the set of those integers as M.

It was conjectured (Shapiro, 1943) that all such numbers are prime, but then composite numbers were found.
According to Guy (2004), Catlin (1970) showed that if m is an odd element of M, then the factors of m are in M.
I propose the conjecture that all primes > 2 in M are either http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FermatPrime.html" or are of the form 2^{t}\times m + 1 with m \in M. In other words, if prime p \in M then either \varphi(p) = 2^{2^{s}} or \varphi(p) = 2^{t}\times m with m \in M, with t and s any positive integers.
Further, a finite number of phi-iterations on m will lead to a number with a factor which is a Fermat prime. For example, take m = 35209, a composite number with the prime factors 137 and 257 (257 is already a Fermat prime). \varphi(35209) = \varphi(137)\times \varphi(257) = 136 \times 256 = 2^{11}\times 17 = 34816 which again has a Fermat prime, 17, as a prime factor.
I would also conjecture that if m is composite, then at least one of its prime factors is a Fermat prime. For example, the largest term in A007755 is 4295098369, which is 65537^{2}.

I would appreciate any comments.

Just another example for the iteration leading to a Fermat prime:

\varphi(140417) = 140416 = 2^{7}\times1097
\varphi(140416) = 2^{6}\times 1096 = 2^{9}\times 137 = 70144
\varphi(70144) = 2^{8}\times 136 = 2^{11}\times 17 = 34816, and so

17, a Fermat prime, divides \varphi^{3}(140417).
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
806
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K