Iterative methods: system of linear equations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on finding an effective technique for solving systems of linear equations that guarantees convergence and is more efficient than traditional methods like Gauss elimination and Cramer's Rule. Participants highlight that while Gauss elimination is widely used due to its convergence properties, it is not the most efficient for large matrices. The LU-factorization schemes are mentioned as faster alternatives, but they often sacrifice absolute convergence. For symmetric positive-definite systems, the conjugate-gradient method is recommended as a viable solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts, particularly systems of linear equations
  • Familiarity with Gauss elimination and Cramer's Rule
  • Knowledge of LU-factorization techniques
  • Awareness of matrix types, specifically symmetric positive-definite matrices
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the conjugate-gradient method for solving symmetric positive-definite systems
  • Explore LU-factorization schemes and their applications
  • Study the convergence properties of iterative methods in linear algebra
  • Investigate alternative iterative methods beyond Jacobi and Gauss-Seidel
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineers, and computer scientists working with numerical methods for solving linear equations, particularly those dealing with large matrices and seeking efficient algorithms.

defunc
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm looking for a an effective technique for solving a system of linear equations. It should always converge, unlike jacobi or gauss seidel etc. It has to be more efficient than ordinary gauss elimination or kramers rule for large matrices.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First off, anything is more efficient than Cramer's Rule!

Secondly, why do you think Gauss elimination is focused so much upon?
It is precisely because it IS the major technique tat always produces convergence.

You may look up into LU-factorization schemes and so on, but typically, these faster (and often preferred) methods will only have conditional convergence.

Simply put, calculation speed is gained by dropping mathematical safe-guards that ensure absolute convergence.

Thus, what you are seeking after is, really, a contradiction in terms.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K