[itex]\int sec(x)tan^{2}(x)[/itex] Can it be integrated w/ U-Sub?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lebombo
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integration of the function ∫ sec(x)tan²(x) dx can be approached using trigonometric identities and integration techniques. By substituting tan²(x) with its identity sec²(x) - 1, the integral simplifies to ∫ (sec³(x) - sec(x)) dx. This can be further separated into two integrals: ∫ sec³(x) dx and ∫ sec(x) dx. The integral of sec³(x) requires the use of integration by parts, while the integral of sec(x) is a standard result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of trigonometric identities, specifically secant and tangent functions.
  • Familiarity with integration techniques, including integration by parts.
  • Knowledge of standard integrals, particularly ∫ sec(x) dx and ∫ sec³(x) dx.
  • Ability to apply U-substitution in integral calculus.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the integral of sec(x).
  • Learn the integration by parts technique in detail, especially for trigonometric functions.
  • Explore the integral of sec³(x) and its derivation.
  • Practice problems involving U-substitution and trigonometric identities in integration.
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, particularly those studying integration techniques, as well as educators looking for effective methods to teach trigonometric integrals.

Lebombo
Messages
144
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Last week, the Professor of the class I'm taking jotted down some even and odd exponent rules of thumb to make life easier when integrating various trig functions. Rules like if you have sinx and cosx and one of the trig functions is odd, then split, use an identity and the U-Sub..etc.

My question is: is this a straight forward integration based on the above mentioned type of rules?

\int sec(x)tan^{2}(x) If I replace the tan^{2}x with its identity (sec^{2}x - 1) I end up with sec^{3} again with an additional secx.

This looks more tricky than simply being able to use those rules.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I speak strictly for myself.

When integrating
\int \left[ \sec^3x - \sec x \,\right] dx

Surely you know you can separate the terms into
\int \sec^3x \,dx - \int \sec x \,dx

Now you should memorized the integral of secant x, so that's out of the way.

You could also memorize the integral of secant cubed, which is nicely demonstrated here.

Then you just back-substitute into the second equation.

Seems like a relatively easy way to integrate in my opinion.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Lebombo said:

Homework Statement





Last week, the Professor of the class I'm taking jotted down some even and odd exponent rules of thumb to make life easier when integrating various trig functions. Rules like if you have sinx and cosx and one of the trig functions is odd, then split, use an identity and the U-Sub..etc.

My question is: is this a straight forward integration based on the above mentioned type of rules?

\int sec(x)tan^{2}(x)


If I replace the tan^{2}x with its identity (sec^{2}x - 1) I end up with sec^{3} again with an additional secx.

This looks more tricky than simply being able to use those rules.
Those rules only work to a certain point. Eventually you get an integral you have to evaluate using other methods, and the integral of ##\sec^3 x## is one of those. Use integration by parts to calculate that one.

You could also forgo the initial use of a trig substitution and evaluate the original integral using integration by parts.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thank you ReneG and Vela.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K