IUPAC Nomenclature: 2-Oxo-cyclopentanitrile or 2-Cyano-cyclopentanone?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Krushnaraj Pandya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Iupac Nomenclature
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the correct IUPAC nomenclature for a compound, debating whether it should be named 2-oxo-cyclopentanitrile or 2-cyano-cyclopentanone. The consensus is that the cyano (CN) group has higher priority than the ketone, suggesting that 2-oxo-cyclopentanitrile is the more accurate name. However, it is acknowledged that both names can be acceptable as long as they are unambiguous. A reference to PubChem supports the argument that the first name is correct. Ultimately, either name can be used in practice, but clarity is essential.
Krushnaraj Pandya
Gold Member
Messages
697
Reaction score
73

Homework Statement


Which name is more correct, 2-oxo-cyclopentanitrile or 2-cyano-cyclopentanone

2. The attempt at a solution

The priority of CN group is higher than ketone, so the first name should be correct but the second name is mentioned in my textbook
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes Krushnaraj Pandya
TeethWhitener said:
Your book is wrong:
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/98930
However, IUPAC also says that a chemical name is acceptable as long as it's unambiguous, so either one would work in practice.
Thank you :D
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
Back
Top